2002
DOI: 10.1111/j.0014-3820.2002.tb00130.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Geographic Variation in Sexual Selection Among Populations of an Iguanid Lizard, Sauromalus Obesus (=ater)

Abstract: Geographic variation in selection pressures may result in population divergence and speciation, especially if sexual selection varies among populations. Yet spatial variation in targets and intensity of sexual selection is well studied in only a few species. Even more rare are simultaneous studies of multiple populations combining observations from natural settings with controlled behavioral experiments. We investigated how sexual selection varies among populations of the chuckwalla, Sauromalus obesus. Chuckwa… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

3
76
0
1

Year Published

2003
2003
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 106 publications
(80 citation statements)
references
References 99 publications
(167 reference statements)
3
76
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A number of examples have been documented in the literature on the variation in traits associated with reproduction among populations (e.g., Boake and Wade 1984;Endler and Houde 1995;Uy and Borgia 2000;Arnaud et al 2001;Kwiatkowski and Sullivan 2002) and the fitness consequences of mating behavior (e.g., Gilburn and Day 1994;Lesna and Sabelis 1999). Our results strongly suggest that generalizations about the fitness effects of polyandry should be made with caution.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 56%
“…A number of examples have been documented in the literature on the variation in traits associated with reproduction among populations (e.g., Boake and Wade 1984;Endler and Houde 1995;Uy and Borgia 2000;Arnaud et al 2001;Kwiatkowski and Sullivan 2002) and the fitness consequences of mating behavior (e.g., Gilburn and Day 1994;Lesna and Sabelis 1999). Our results strongly suggest that generalizations about the fitness effects of polyandry should be made with caution.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 56%
“…In other populations of P. muralis, there are different color morphs, which also differ in average immune responses (Sacchi et al 2007). Male color variability may be important because, for example, color brightness seems to be preferred by females in several lizard species (e.g., Baird et al 1997;Kwiatkowski and Sullivan 2002), which may use coloration as a signal of male condition.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In birds, hue and saturation of feathers are positively correlated with the total carotenoid content of the feathers (Saks et al 2003b). In chuckwalla lizards, Sauromalus obesus, male color likely functions as an indicator of food resources to females because male color is based partly on carotenoid pigments (Kwiatkowski and Sullivan 2002). It is likely that only those male lizard P. muralis with less parasites and a greater immune response were able to find or defend more food resources and allocate more yellow carotenoids to their Similarly, chemicals used in secretions of lizards may be important in many physiological functions and can only be allocated to secretions if they are diverted from general metabolism.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Because genitalic features are not usually 'adaptive' in the traditional sense, they are unlikely subject to the same selective forces operating on other phenotypic attributes. However, selection resulting from geographic variation in environmental conditions can indirectly drive divergence of mating signals and preferences (Schluter 2001;Kwiatkowski and Sullivan 2002) such that genitalia, or other premating and postmating barriers, evolve as a secondary consequence of ecological divergence. Moreover, speciation is considered by some to be inevitable for allopatric populations maintained over extended periods of time; thus, mating isolation is sometimes thought to evolve, facilitated by random genetic drift (Lande 1981), simply in response to the absence of forces maintaining reproductive compatibility (Turelli et al 2001).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%