2016
DOI: 10.1590/0001-3765201620140631
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Geographic variation in skull shape of the water rat Scapteromys tumidus (Cricetidae, Sigmodontinae): isolation-by-distance plus environmental and geographic barrier effects?

Abstract: The geographic variation in skull size and shape of the swamp rat Scapteromys tumidus was examined in samples from eight geographic clusters in almost of its distribution in southern Brazil and Uruguay. For analysis we used two-dimensional geometric morphometric methods for dorsal, ventral and lateral views of the skull. The geometric descriptors showed no signifi cant differences in skull size between geographic clusters, while differences in shape were highly signifi cant. We found a signifi cant and moderat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
3
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
2
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Potentially, this could be explained by the isolation-by-distance model (Wright 1943), whereby the further the populations are from each other, the more limited the dispersal between them will be, and consequently the more differentiation. The association between skull morphometric and geographic distance is not a novel observation, and has been shown to occur in numerous previous rodent studies (Muñoz-Muñoz et al 2011;Cordero and Epps 2012;Quintela et al 2016;Alhajeri 2018;Alhajeri 2019). Other non-climatic spatial factors unexamined in this study could also explain the detected association with skull variation, such as environmental heterogeneity and geographic barriers (Quintela et al 2016).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 60%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Potentially, this could be explained by the isolation-by-distance model (Wright 1943), whereby the further the populations are from each other, the more limited the dispersal between them will be, and consequently the more differentiation. The association between skull morphometric and geographic distance is not a novel observation, and has been shown to occur in numerous previous rodent studies (Muñoz-Muñoz et al 2011;Cordero and Epps 2012;Quintela et al 2016;Alhajeri 2018;Alhajeri 2019). Other non-climatic spatial factors unexamined in this study could also explain the detected association with skull variation, such as environmental heterogeneity and geographic barriers (Quintela et al 2016).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 60%
“…The association between skull morphometric and geographic distance is not a novel observation, and has been shown to occur in numerous previous rodent studies (Muñoz-Muñoz et al 2011;Cordero and Epps 2012;Quintela et al 2016;Alhajeri 2018;Alhajeri 2019). Other non-climatic spatial factors unexamined in this study could also explain the detected association with skull variation, such as environmental heterogeneity and geographic barriers (Quintela et al 2016).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 60%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Similarly, studies on haplogroups of sympatric akodonts (e.g., Deltamys kempi [ 63 , 64 ] and Scapteromys spp. [ 65 , 66 ]). were also divergent in the geometric or linear morphometric analysis of the skull.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, White and Searle examined the correlation between genetic diversity and fluctuating asymmetry (FA) in mandibles from island and mainland populations of common shrews on the west coast of Scotland using GM analysis 43 . Similarly, Quintela et al investigated the geographic variation in skull size and shape among populations of the swamp rat Scapteromys tumidus across eight geographic clusters in southern Brazil, utilizing dorsal, ventral, and lateral views of the skull 44 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%