2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.apgeog.2007.07.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Geographical accessibility and Kentucky's heart-related hospital services

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
62
1
2

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 102 publications
(68 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
3
62
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…16 A review of access to general cardiac services in Kentucky that reported the spatial statistical comparison of the geographical distribution with service use and travel time to hospitals showed that people living in rural areas traveled further to services and that populations residing Ͼ45 minutes from health facilities were more likely to be socially and economically marginalized. 47 Another Australian study that used simple Google maps to measure access to PCI was consistent with our results, demonstrating that 78% of Australian cardiac catheterization laboratories were located in major cities and that a significant number of Australians could not access PCI within the time frames recommended in guidelines. [2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13]17 The findings in our study reflect the size and nature of the Australian continent, in which it appears that access to cardiac services may represent an all-or-nothing situation, with almost one third of the population (29%) outside the road distance (and time frame) for primary cardiac intervention.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 72%
“…16 A review of access to general cardiac services in Kentucky that reported the spatial statistical comparison of the geographical distribution with service use and travel time to hospitals showed that people living in rural areas traveled further to services and that populations residing Ͼ45 minutes from health facilities were more likely to be socially and economically marginalized. 47 Another Australian study that used simple Google maps to measure access to PCI was consistent with our results, demonstrating that 78% of Australian cardiac catheterization laboratories were located in major cities and that a significant number of Australians could not access PCI within the time frames recommended in guidelines. [2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13]17 The findings in our study reflect the size and nature of the Australian continent, in which it appears that access to cardiac services may represent an all-or-nothing situation, with almost one third of the population (29%) outside the road distance (and time frame) for primary cardiac intervention.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 72%
“…GIS is the most common tool applied so far to spatial analysis. The capabilities of GIS to handle massive amounts of data over large geographic areas at fine levels of geographic details make it suitable to analyze accessibility to medical service providers (Harea & Barcus, 2007).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Taking the localities as a unit of origin, an aggregation of values was done considering the average travel times from these localities to the district level for their incorporation as a dependent variable in the modelling. The travel times were integrated into diverse studies in order to model accessibility to primary health care centres/hospitals (Brabyn and Skelly, 2001;Hare and Barcus, 2007;Bagheri et al, 2009;Rodríguez, 2010;Munoz and Kallestal, 2012), where the location factor (population, health care centres) and the characteristics of the network were considered in order to obtain the travel time factor (speed and length of the road sections).…”
Section: Accessibility Modelling Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%