2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecocom.2009.02.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Geographical and climatic differences in long-term effect of organic and inorganic amendments on soil enzymatic activities and respiration in field experimental stations of China

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
22
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
1
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this study, the enzyme activities (amylase, cellulase and invertase) were higher at different vegetation sites compared with those at the control site due to the higher organic carbon content in the vegetation sites. Similar observation was reported by Fernandes et al (2005) and Ge et al (2009). This may again be attributed to higher level of organic sources which accelerate the growth and activity of microorganisms.…”
Section: Influence Of Soil Organic Carbon On Enzyme Activitiessupporting
confidence: 86%
“…In this study, the enzyme activities (amylase, cellulase and invertase) were higher at different vegetation sites compared with those at the control site due to the higher organic carbon content in the vegetation sites. Similar observation was reported by Fernandes et al (2005) and Ge et al (2009). This may again be attributed to higher level of organic sources which accelerate the growth and activity of microorganisms.…”
Section: Influence Of Soil Organic Carbon On Enzyme Activitiessupporting
confidence: 86%
“…In addition, chemical fertilization significantly enhanced the activities of soil oxidoreductase (catalase and dehydrogenase), and most extracellular enzymes involved in C (cellulase and polyphenol oxidase), N (urease and nitrate reductase), P (acid phosphatase) and S cycling (arylsulfatase) and were in general agreement with the functional gene data as revealed by GEOCHIP (Tables 2 and 4). This may be the consequence of stimulation of both microbial growth and activity by improved nutrient availability as well as the changes in microbial community composition induced by different fertilization regimes (Chu et al 2007;Ge et al 2009;Ai et al 2012). In addition, the improvement of soil physical properties by chemical fertilization could make the soil environment more favourable for microbial growth (Haynes & Naidu 1998;Iovieno et al 2009).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Phosphorus ratios have changed from a deficit to small surplus (with a large surplus in some vegetable areas), but potassium is generally still in deficit (Shen et al 2005). Unbalanced nutrient ratios in mixed synthetic fertilizers can cause both biological and physicochemical damage to soils, leading to acidification, secondary salinization and reduction of microbial activity (Cao et al 2004;Ge et al 2009;Guo et al 2010). This damage lowers crop yields and may lead to farmers applying even more fertilizers to try to compensate for the reduced soil productivity and thereby intensify NPS pollution and the cycle of environmental degradation.…”
Section: Reasons For Unsuitable Application Of Fertilizer and Pesticimentioning
confidence: 99%