2015
DOI: 10.1007/s11250-015-0891-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Geographical assessment of body measurements and qualitative traits in West African cattle

Abstract: A total of 1015 adult cows belonging to nine West African cattle breeds were assessed for 16 body measurements and 18 qualitative traits to ascertain the existence of geographical patterns of variation. Sampling was carried out in 29 different provinces of Mali, Burkina Faso and Benin. For body measurements, taurine breeds took lower average values than the zebu breeds. Sanga cattle took intermediate values. Qualitative traits did not allow to differentiate among cattle groups (taurine, zebu or sanga) or breed… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

5
43
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
5
43
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, only 15 of them coincided with those obtained by Traoré et al (2015Traoré et al ( , 2016 in nine West African cattle populations. Moreover, definition of two of the traits recorded (tail length and facial width) differed between the current research and the project of Traoré et al (2015Traoré et al ( , 2016.…”
Section: Datamentioning
confidence: 59%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…However, only 15 of them coincided with those obtained by Traoré et al (2015Traoré et al ( , 2016 in nine West African cattle populations. Moreover, definition of two of the traits recorded (tail length and facial width) differed between the current research and the project of Traoré et al (2015Traoré et al ( , 2016.…”
Section: Datamentioning
confidence: 59%
“…However, only 15 of them coincided with those obtained by Traoré et al (2015Traoré et al ( , 2016 in nine West African cattle populations. Moreover, definition of two of the traits recorded (tail length and facial width) differed between the current research and the project of Traoré et al (2015Traoré et al ( , 2016. Therefore, after editing, only 13 quantitative traits were used for analyses (Tables 1 and 2): facial length (from orbital fossa to upper lip), muzzle circumference, horn length (greater curvature), ear length, height at withers, heart girth, height at hips (tuber coxae), body length (from lateral tuberosity of the humerus to tuber ischii), thorax depth, shoulder width (between lateral tuberosities of the humerus), pelvic width (between tuber ischii), ischium width (between tuber ischii) and rump length (from tuber coxae to tuber ischii).…”
Section: Datamentioning
confidence: 59%
See 3 more Smart Citations