Geographical mobility of UK trainee doctors, from family home to first job: a national cohort study

Abstract

BackgroundThe UK faces geographical variation in the recruitment of doctors. Understanding where medical graduates choose to go for training is important because doctors are more likely to consider practicing in areas where they completed postgraduate training. The wider literature also suggests that there is a relationship between origin and background, and where doctors wish to train/work. Thus, the purpose of this paper is to investigate the geographical mobility of UK medical graduates from different socio-economic groups in terms of where they wish to spend their first years of postgraduate training.MethodsThis was an observational study of Foundation Programme (FP) doctors who graduated from 33 UK medical schools between 2012 and 2014. Data was accessed via the UK medical education database (UKMED: https://www.ukmed.ac.uk/). Chi-square tests were used to examine the relationships between doctor’s sociodemographic characteristics and the dependent variable, average driving time from parental home to foundation school/region. Generalised Linear Mixed Models (GLMM) were used to estimate the effects of those factors in combination against the outcome measure.ResultsThe majority of doctors prefer to train at foundation schools that are reasonably close to the family home. Those who attended state-funded schools, from non-white ethnic groups and/or from lower socio-economic groups were significantly more likely to choose foundation schools nearer their parental home. Doctors from disadvantaged backgrounds (as determined by entitlement to free school meals, OR = 1.29, p = 0.003 and no parental degree, OR = 1.34, p < 0.001) were associated with higher odds of selecting a foundation schools that were closer to parental home.ConclusionThe data suggests that recruiting medical students from lower socioeconomic groups and those who originate from under-recruiting areas may be at least part of the solution to filling training posts in these areas. This has obvious implications for the widening access agenda, and equitable distribution of health services.

Today's doctors: What do men and women value in a training post?

“…The importance of locality in terms of training near friends and family is of interest. Many studies have shown that medical graduates typical migrate back home at some point in their careers 64‐66 . Our definition of location, developed via qualitative work, 7 specifically included reference to being near family and friends who are important in terms of social support.…”

Taking a break: doctors opt out of training after foundation year 2

“…Research shows, for example, strong connections between admission decisions by medical schools and the choices made by FY2 doctors about both specialty and place of work 78…”

Differences in progression by surgical specialty: a national cohort study

“…These data have been used to study outcomes and progression in medical specialties and foundation programme extensively and have been shown to be reliable. [13][14][15] Patient and public involvement Patient and public involvement was not sought given the educational nature of the study and the fact no patients were included in the study.…”

“…These data can be modelled to assess the differences in ARCP outcomes between surgical specialties. These data have been used to study outcomes and progression in medical specialties and foundation programme extensively and have been shown to be reliable 13–15…”