2014
DOI: 10.1007/s10310-013-0416-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Geographical variation in age-height relationships for dominant trees in Japanese cedar (Cryptomeria japonica D. Don) forests in Japan

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
23
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
1
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The size of trees to be measured was different for each circle; trees >1 cm, 5 cm and >18 cm in diameter at breast height (DBH) were measured in the S, M and L circles, respectively. In each plot, the tree height was measured for at least 20 trees, which were expected to be selected from a wide range of tree sizes to construct a DBH-height curve for the plot [23,25,31,38,39]. We used the information of species, DBH and tree height from the 40 measurement variables to calculate the plot-level stand volume.…”
Section: In Situ Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The size of trees to be measured was different for each circle; trees >1 cm, 5 cm and >18 cm in diameter at breast height (DBH) were measured in the S, M and L circles, respectively. In each plot, the tree height was measured for at least 20 trees, which were expected to be selected from a wide range of tree sizes to construct a DBH-height curve for the plot [23,25,31,38,39]. We used the information of species, DBH and tree height from the 40 measurement variables to calculate the plot-level stand volume.…”
Section: In Situ Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because we did not have any accurate wall-to-wall digital maps of the forest types for this study area, we used forest type information (FTYPE; categorical variable), which was determined by the FRMS plot data itself. The FRMS plots were grouped into two classes (evergreen coniferous forest, ECF; broad-leaved forest, BF) by the dominant analysis [31,43] and the following procedures: (1) To obtain the dominant tree species group in all plots, first, all species of trees within each FRMS plot were classified into five tree species groups (evergreen coniferous, deciduous coniferous, evergreen broad-leaved, deciduous broad-leaved and bamboo); then, the dominant tree species group was determined based on the maximum basal area (m 2 ) within each plot. (2) Plots that were dominated by bamboo trees were excluded from the analysis.…”
Section: Additional Feature Variablesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Currently, many foresters have paid increased attention to the estimation of site productivity through site indices based on the national forest inventory (NFI) data [12][13][14][15][16][17][18]. However, NFI data always lack stand top height in some countries, such as China [19,20] and Japan [18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%