2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijid.2010.07.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Geographical variation in human papillomavirus prevalence in Mexican women with normal cytology

Abstract: Regional differences in HPV prevalence and distribution show an apparent geographic boundary between the studied populations that deserves further analysis, taking into account other factors such as those related to the sexual partners.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

5
34
3
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
5
34
3
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In this study less than 50% of the women were infected with one or more HPV genotypes, which were heterogeneously distributed irrespective of their oncogenic risk. Our results are comparable with those from other studies with Mexican women [11] [18] [19]. In contrast, a meta-analysis about worldwide HPV detection among women with normal cytological findings, revealed an estimated frequency for Central America (including Mexico) of around 20%, while estimated frequencies for worldwide and developing region were 7.2% and 14.3%, respectively [20].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this study less than 50% of the women were infected with one or more HPV genotypes, which were heterogeneously distributed irrespective of their oncogenic risk. Our results are comparable with those from other studies with Mexican women [11] [18] [19]. In contrast, a meta-analysis about worldwide HPV detection among women with normal cytological findings, revealed an estimated frequency for Central America (including Mexico) of around 20%, while estimated frequencies for worldwide and developing region were 7.2% and 14.3%, respectively [20].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Rise in worldwide HPV prevalence among women, and consequently a rise in cases of cervical cancer (from 378,000 cases per year in 1980 to 454,000 cases per year in 2010), has been observed in the past 2 decades, although it varies geographically, and according to age and other factors [11]- [15].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some studies concerning HPV in Mexico have shown some differences in the prevalence reported. Such differences range from 4.8% to 40.9% and suggest a variability of HPV frequencies regarding geographical zone (Torroella-Kouri et al, 1998;Gonzalez-Losa et al, 2004;Pina-Sanchez et al, 2006;Sanchez-Anguiano et al, 2006;Lopez-Revilla et al, 2008;Velazquez-Marquez et al, 2009;Canul-Canche et al, 2010;Illades-Aguilar et al, 2010;Orozco-Colin et al, 2010;Velazquez-Marquez et al, 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5 HPV is classified as low or high risk based on its association with premalignant and malignant lesions, respectively. Low-risk HPVs include 6,11,40,42,43,44,54,61,70,72, and 81. Of these types, 6 and 11 cause 90% of cases of anogenital warts and low grade in cervical cells.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…10 In Mexico, HPV 16, 18, 31, 33, 39, 45, 53, 58 and 59 have frequently been found in normal cervical samples. [11][12][13][14][15][16][17] In the year 2015 in the United States they report that the most common highrisk human papillomavirus is serotype 16, associated with precancerous lesions in the cervix and conferring greater risk of disease of high-grade lesions; also reported that 50% of adenocarcinoma in situ and 50% of cases of invasive cancer were attributable to HPV infection 18.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%