2009
DOI: 10.1038/hdy.2009.32
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Geographically localised bursts of ribosomal DNA mobility in the grasshopper Podisma pedestris

Abstract: We report extraordinary variation in the number and the chromosomal location of ribosomal DNA (rDNA) arrays within populations of the alpine grasshopper Podisma pedestris; even greater differences were found between populations. The sites were detected by in situ hybridisation of labelled rDNA to chromosomal preparations. The total number of rDNA sites in an individual varied from three to thirteen. In the most extreme case, individuals from populations only 10 km apart had no rDNA loci in common. A survey of … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…NOR clusters thus behave as neutral genetic markers tracking evolutionary variation in the nuclear genome among subspecies of M. musculus (see Veltsos et al, 2009). The processes regulating this variability remain, however, poorly understood.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…NOR clusters thus behave as neutral genetic markers tracking evolutionary variation in the nuclear genome among subspecies of M. musculus (see Veltsos et al, 2009). The processes regulating this variability remain, however, poorly understood.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, these investigations often included only one or a few individuals per species, so population surveys of NOR variability using FISH remain scarce (Veltsos et al, 2009). One indication of intraspecific NOR variability stems from a study in humans in which 54.2% exhibited a polymorphism for the absence/presence of rRNA genes on the NOR-bearing chromosomes (Zavala Guillén et al, 2004).…”
Section: Consequences For Phylogenetic Reconstructionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An intermediate situation between types 1 and 2 rDNA distribution is found within the Gomphocerini tribe, in G. rufus , which has 5 clusters of rDNA in pericentric C-blocks. Intragenomic spread of rDNA has been shown in other grasshopper species [Bugrov et al, 2003[Bugrov et al, , 2004Cabrero and Camacho, 2008;Lopez-Leon et al, 2008;Veltsos et al, 2009], and the mobile nature of rDNA was first suggested by Schubert [1984] and Schubert and Wobus [1985] and has frequently been mentioned in the literature. Although the spread of rDNA repeats among pericentric regions from nonhomologous chromosomes may actually occur by transposition of mobile elements and the presence of transposable elements in rDNA clusters is well documented [Eickbush et al, 1997;Eickbush, 2002;Eickbush and Eickbush, 2007], the mechanisms by which this spread takes place are unknown (but see interesting hypotheses in Dubcovsky and Dvorak [1995]).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, how could this happen? Several surveys have suggested that rDNA (both 5S rDNA and the major ribosomal genes) frequently moves on from one location to another in the eukaryote genome (Rooney and Ward, 2005;Datson and Murray, 2006;Veltos et al, 2009;Nguyen et al, 2010), and several mechanisms have been proposed to explain this apparent mobility. Drouin and Moniz de Sá (1995) hypothesised that a 5S rDNA transposition could be produced at the DNA level mediated by extrachromosomal circular DNA or by an RNA intermediate.…”
Section: Upstream Elements Internal Regulatory Regions and Downstreamentioning
confidence: 99%