2013
DOI: 10.1002/grl.50945
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Geographically versus dynamically defined boundary layer cloud regimes and their use to evaluate general circulation model cloud parameterizations

Abstract: Regimes of tropical low-level clouds are commonly identified according to large-scale subsidence and lower tropospheric stability (LTS). This definition alone is insufficient for the distinction between regimes and limits the comparison of low-level clouds from CloudSat radar observations and the ECHAM5 GCM run with the COSP radar simulator. Comparisons of CloudSat radar cloud altitude-reflectivity histograms for stratocumulus and shallow cumulus regimes, as defined above, show nearly identical reflectivity pr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
26
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Yet, this feature does not hold true for S I except the case based on the 2B-GEOPROF data set with the −15 dBZ threshold. Our results also suggest that it is important to account for the influence of atmospheric stability due to the clear dependence of S POP on metrics like LTSS, though it is acknowledged that LTSS alone is an imperfect metric for isolating cloud regimes (e.g., Nam and Quaas, 2013). Different metrics associated with cloud regimes should be examined in the future to better understand the effect of cloud regimes on precipitation susceptibility.…”
Section: S X_y Under Different Stability Regimesmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…Yet, this feature does not hold true for S I except the case based on the 2B-GEOPROF data set with the −15 dBZ threshold. Our results also suggest that it is important to account for the influence of atmospheric stability due to the clear dependence of S POP on metrics like LTSS, though it is acknowledged that LTSS alone is an imperfect metric for isolating cloud regimes (e.g., Nam and Quaas, 2013). Different metrics associated with cloud regimes should be examined in the future to better understand the effect of cloud regimes on precipitation susceptibility.…”
Section: S X_y Under Different Stability Regimesmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…Medeiros and Stevens, 2009;Muhlbauer et al, 2014). These regimes can often be related to specific cloud types, but they are not necessarily a good constraint on the cloud properties if the regimes are not defined using the correct 5 parameters (Nam and Quaas, 2013;Leinonen et al, 2016). However, it is not required that these regimes map to the "Howard"…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We computed yearly mean values in six stratocumulus regions (see Fig. 4) and compared the differences in these six regions between simulations with present-day and preindustrial aerosol emissions and then took a weighted average (Nam and Quaas, 2013, used a similar approach to evaluate boundary layer clouds in satellite and model data). This raises the statistical significance of some model variables globally as the difference in the simulations in some stratocumulus regions can be larger than the internal variability.…”
Section: Methodology and Observational Datamentioning
confidence: 99%