2022
DOI: 10.1109/tgrs.2021.3115136
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Geographically Weighted Spatial Unmixing for Spatiotemporal Fusion

Abstract: Spatio-temporal fusion is a technique applied to create images with both fine spatial and temporal resolutions by blending images with different spatial and temporal resolutions. Spatial unmixing is a widely used approach for spatio-temporal fusion, which requires only the minimum number of input images. However, ignorance of spatial variation in land cover between pixels is a common issue in existing spatial unmixing methods. For example, all coarse neighbors in a local window are treated equally in the unmix… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Strong temporal shifts are difficult to forecast, but they can be detected via methods such as spatial filtering. One popular method for fusing spatial and temporal information is spatial unmixing (SU) [137]. Nevertheless, the diverse range of landscapes necessitates that distinct neighboring coarse pixels make varying contributions to the core pixel.…”
Section: Spatial Weighing-based Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Strong temporal shifts are difficult to forecast, but they can be detected via methods such as spatial filtering. One popular method for fusing spatial and temporal information is spatial unmixing (SU) [137]. Nevertheless, the diverse range of landscapes necessitates that distinct neighboring coarse pixels make varying contributions to the core pixel.…”
Section: Spatial Weighing-based Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Retain spatial and spectral properties while integrating temporal traces Large computational cost, less computation efficiency compared to STARFM and Fit-FC FSDAF [161] Provide a fused image in a relatively swift manner, fast running speed Compromised performance IFSDAF [162] Improve the resolution of images Seamless spatial prediction results, leading to the loss of spatial details SFSDAF [163] Improved prediction accuracy Computational burden, uncertainty in prediction model geographical weighting (GW)-based SU technique [137] is used; however, using nearby pixels for prediction may cause image blurring and the loss of high-frequency features.…”
Section: Hybrid Approaches Strum [213]mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Following the framework proposed by Zhukov et al [24], unmixing-based methods [25][26][27][28] employ spatial unmixing techniques for fusion, which estimate the highresolution endmembers by unmixing the coarse-resolution pixels using the class scores explained by the reference image. Due to the wide spectrum and large resolution ratio, the unmixing-based methods may be prone to errors in abundance estimation, spectral variations, and nonlinear mixing.…”
Section: Background and Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Its revisions, such as SFSDAF [38], FSDAF 2.0 [39], and EFSDAF [40], can also be categorized into this type. Other hybrid studies [28,41] integrated weight and unmixing strategies, too. Our previous work [42] is also a hybrid type, which integrates the results of FSDAF and Fit-FC to enhance performance.…”
Section: Background and Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lying between measurement and the ability to identify and label the original objects of interest is the concept of the 'mixed pixel' (Peng et al, 2022). Mixed pixels occur when more than one object class contributes to the overall signal measured and allocated to a pixel.…”
Section: Spatial Objectsmentioning
confidence: 99%