Geographies of Differences (and Resistances) in Urbanized and Depopulated Remote Rural Areas

Paniagua, Ángel

doi:10.1007/978-3-319-71065-5_136-1

Cited by 2 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 53 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Other works of a more social nature insist on the global-rural negotiation of globalization and diversity in rural localities [32,100]. Other options show the different paths of rurality in urban settings and in the countryside [101], in this sense all the paths remain open in rural geography. In this context, it would be necessary to articulate a more-than-rural geography on the basis of the behavior of the rural individual that would allow synthesizing trends and articulating urban and rural spaces where social difference, beyond its size of populations, in many occasions is not the most relevant.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Sustainable Geographical Changes in Rural Areas: Key Paths, Orientations and Limits

Paniagua

2021

Sustainability

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Rural differentiation processes have formed the backbone of rural studies. Owing to the strength of rural–urban and local–global relationships, the theoretical approaches to rural restructuring in the Anglo-Saxon world and new rurality in Latin America only have a limited capacity to explain contemporary global phenomena of rural spaces. Due to this, transverse theoretical and methodological approaches have emerged to explain social, environmental and spatial (rural) processes. Here, a new approach is proposed called the individual–global field, based on the individual–global binary category to substitute the traditional relevance of the locality–community–globality association This new approach tries to reinvigorate rural geography in a more flexible way, based on minor theory, to adapt to all the phenomena that can occur globally. In any case, various spatial planes are proposed, dominated by specific socioeconomic processes on which the rural individual would move.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%