DOI: 10.18174/553302
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Geographies of fear : Exploring the transboundary nature of conservation and conflict among the Democratic Republic of the Congo, Rwanda and Uganda

Abstract: IIIiii challenges of PhD administration. The time in Wageningen would have been cold and empty without the light-filling moments with Britt Broekhaus. In deepest appreciation I want to thank Yvette Buist sharing her beautiful soul with me and Julia van Middelaar who is always there, always shining, always taking care of me when I forgot myself. Further, I am grateful to have met Anne Leroy -her encouragement and her mapping skills can be found on these pages.These years of research and fieldwork would not have… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 115 publications
(251 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast, political ecology rarely explicitly links affect and the need to secure liberal life (cf. Büscher, 2016; Trogisch, 2021). This article joins these fields by analysing how eco-war tourism presents itself as a way to save imperilled nature and, in doing so, shapes and is shaped by affective geographies of violence, suffering and danger.…”
Section: War-zone Tourism Green Militarization and Their Affective Ge...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, political ecology rarely explicitly links affect and the need to secure liberal life (cf. Büscher, 2016; Trogisch, 2021). This article joins these fields by analysing how eco-war tourism presents itself as a way to save imperilled nature and, in doing so, shapes and is shaped by affective geographies of violence, suffering and danger.…”
Section: War-zone Tourism Green Militarization and Their Affective Ge...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the past decade, there has been an increase in papers that explicitly account for methods, doubts, and difficulties (Perera, 2017), or that describe how serendipity and 'meta-data' have shaped research (Fujii, 2010(Fujii, , 2014 or how fieldwork is increasingly constrained by safety politics at universities (Peter & Strazzari, 2017), and ethic/institutional review boards (Vlavonou, 2021). Over the past 2 years, several publications and projects critically assessed power imbalances towards in-country academics (see the (Silent) Voices "Bukavu series") and the ethical -(Cronin-Furman and Lake, 2018), and emotional aspects of research affecting knowledge production (Trogisch, 2021). Reflecting on positionality and fieldwork in published work is more common in, for instance, anthropology (Diphoorn, 2013;Lecoq, 2002;Rodgers, 2007;Lombard, 2013).…”
Section: State Of the Artmentioning
confidence: 99%