2016
DOI: 10.1177/0309132516680756
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Geographies of production III

Abstract: This is the accepted version of the paper.This version of the publication may differ from the final published version. Permanent repository link AbstractWithin economic geography there has been a growing body of work that straddles the disciplinary boundaries of management studies and international business (IB) scholarship.Whilst this growing cross-disciplinary proximity may be related to increasing numbers of economic geographers being located in business and management schools, this report argues that it a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 87 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Analyzing the role of THOFC in global corporate networks requires an understanding about why firms locate where they do, and how this choice has both shaped and been shaped by regional alliances and networks (Barney, 1991;Gulati, 1998). Whilst this is a rising subject within the EG and SM literatures, there has been limited crossdialogue despite their increasingly spatial thinking of the relationship between firm-level decisions and corporate geographies (Cantwell, 2014;Jones, 2018;Mudambi et al, 2018). Similar intersections have been explored in other ideologically similar theories, such as world city networks (WCN) and global production networks (GPN), in which collaborative projects examined the relationship between actor decision-making in production and global economic connections (Coe, Dicken, Hess, & Yeung, 2010;Taylor, Derudder, Faulconbridge, Hoyler, & Ni, 2014).…”
Section: Firm Strategic Organization In Thofcmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Analyzing the role of THOFC in global corporate networks requires an understanding about why firms locate where they do, and how this choice has both shaped and been shaped by regional alliances and networks (Barney, 1991;Gulati, 1998). Whilst this is a rising subject within the EG and SM literatures, there has been limited crossdialogue despite their increasingly spatial thinking of the relationship between firm-level decisions and corporate geographies (Cantwell, 2014;Jones, 2018;Mudambi et al, 2018). Similar intersections have been explored in other ideologically similar theories, such as world city networks (WCN) and global production networks (GPN), in which collaborative projects examined the relationship between actor decision-making in production and global economic connections (Coe, Dicken, Hess, & Yeung, 2010;Taylor, Derudder, Faulconbridge, Hoyler, & Ni, 2014).…”
Section: Firm Strategic Organization In Thofcmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While several staple theories of SM and international business (IB) such as the resource-based view (Wernerfelt, 1984), and Dunning's (1977) ownership location internationalization (OLI), treat space and place as strategic assets (cf. Jones, 2018), or as part of a strategy to access factors of production or new markets, the integration of THOFC into firm networks suggests that new geographical considerations are at work. Financialization of the firm, and the economy more broadly, has meant that MNCs have shifted their locational considerations toward those that optimize balance sheets.…”
Section: Firm Strategic Organization In Thofcmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Outlining the strategies adopted by a company in a new cultural context and the adjustment of the management approach in the face of various cultural differences' impact is crucial. Decisions taken in the international business environment might lead to a loss of management control on the host country market (Jansson, 2007). Fulfilling economic, legal, and political requirements in an unfamiliar territory may not be achieved if the cultural rules and norms are not met (Ramirez et al, 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%