2009
DOI: 10.1007/s11187-009-9245-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Geography, knowledge spillovers and small firms’ exports: an empirical examination for The Netherlands

Abstract: Exports, Innovation, Scale economies, Small firms, L26, R12, Q31,

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
16
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
1
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Intermediary organisations playing a brokering and capability building role are likely to be 11 This is warranted by analysis of the positive externalities from R&D and innovation which suggest that these effects can be significant (Mansfield, Rapoport, Romero, Wagner and Beardsley 1977), strongly localised (Ceh 2009;Feldman 2003) and vary markedly by technology type (van Beers and van der Panne 2011;Kesidou, Caniels, and Romijn 2009;Moreno, Paci, and Usai 2005;Fritsch and Franke 2004). As such this argument for intervention in supporting OI activities directly parallels the standard justification for public R&D and innovation support with its benefits to generate positive externalities (Crespo, Fontoura, and Proenca 2009;Norberg-Bohm 2000;Mohnen 1996). central to any such interventions (Watkins and Horley 1986;Mantel and Rosseger 1987;Gould and Fernandez 1989;Howells 2006;Clarysse et al 2014) 12 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Intermediary organisations playing a brokering and capability building role are likely to be 11 This is warranted by analysis of the positive externalities from R&D and innovation which suggest that these effects can be significant (Mansfield, Rapoport, Romero, Wagner and Beardsley 1977), strongly localised (Ceh 2009;Feldman 2003) and vary markedly by technology type (van Beers and van der Panne 2011;Kesidou, Caniels, and Romijn 2009;Moreno, Paci, and Usai 2005;Fritsch and Franke 2004). As such this argument for intervention in supporting OI activities directly parallels the standard justification for public R&D and innovation support with its benefits to generate positive externalities (Crespo, Fontoura, and Proenca 2009;Norberg-Bohm 2000;Mohnen 1996). central to any such interventions (Watkins and Horley 1986;Mantel and Rosseger 1987;Gould and Fernandez 1989;Howells 2006;Clarysse et al 2014) 12 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…PRX i = PRO i − PRO as an indicator of abnormal returns [69], where PRO i = pre-tax profits for company i and PRO = annual average profits. Several research works have adopted a similar approach regarding the use of explanatory variables of profitability in export companies (e.g., [70]). PRX i /SAL i is an indicator of the effort required to achieve the result, where SAL i are the sales for company i.…”
Section: Relationship Between Degree Of Compliance Size and Performmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Their results suggest that specialisation externalities do not affect export performance, but scale economies combined with urbanisation externalities have an impact on export. Van Beers and van der Panne () discuss the impact of external (and internal) economies of scale on the probability to start exporting and on the export intensity of a sample of product‐innovation‐announcing firms in the Netherlands. They find that specialisation has a negative and statistically significant impact on both the probability to export and the export intensity, while local variety has a negligible effect.…”
Section: Agglomeration and Export Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…; Fazio & Maltese ) has been widely investigated during the last two decades, only recently a body of literature has analysed the relationship between agglomeration and international linkages (Becchetti & Rossi ; Becchetti et al . ; Antonietti & Cainelli ; van Beers & van der Panne ; Rodríguez‐Pose et al . ; Cainelli et al .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation