2000
DOI: 10.1111/j.1475-4762.2000.tb00133.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Geography matters? Whiteness and contemporary geography

Abstract: Summary The critique of whiteness furthers important critiques of static notions of ethnicity and identity. Interesting work on ‘white‐blind’ geographers working on race and ethnicity has recently been initiated, yet a more systematic and wide ranging critique of the norms and assumptions of contemporary geographical research has yet to be fully established. After reviewing the recent White Studies literature, this paper examines an influential piece of contemporary geographical writing and suggests that… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0
1

Year Published

2002
2002
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
20
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In circumstances where such talk becomes common, the uneven dispensation of citizenship and belonging becomes normalized, unquestioned, and harder to challenge. What emerges has been described by Kobayashi and Peake (2000) as the 'normalcy' of racism, where racism is almost unnoticed or seen as an aberration (McGuiness, 2000). Certain forms of exclusive situational norms are generated.…”
Section: Racism and Anti-racismmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In circumstances where such talk becomes common, the uneven dispensation of citizenship and belonging becomes normalized, unquestioned, and harder to challenge. What emerges has been described by Kobayashi and Peake (2000) as the 'normalcy' of racism, where racism is almost unnoticed or seen as an aberration (McGuiness, 2000). Certain forms of exclusive situational norms are generated.…”
Section: Racism and Anti-racismmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By recognizing whiteness 'as a racial category rather than unmarked norm against which the racial difference of others is judged' (Nash 2003, 639), whiteness is revealed as contingent and mutable (Price 2010). This has enabled the differentiation of different strands of whiteness thereby destabilizing notions of 'white' identity as homogenous and stable by highlighting the significance of practices, performances, and perceptions in constituting a 'white' identity (Jackson 1998;McGuinness 2000;Nayak 2006Nayak , 2011Twine 1996).…”
Section: Gendered Geographies Of Race and Racializationmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Within geography, there have been a number of recent calls (Kobayashi and Peake 2000;McGuinness 2000;Bonnett and Nayak 2003;Hoelscher 2003;J. McCarthy and Hague 2004) for examinations of racialization and whiteness outside of the sites where ''race'' and racism have most often been presumed to matter: in the case of the United States, the nation's large, segregated urban areas and the U.S. South (as in Nast 2000), as well as the exclusionary ''white bread'' suburbs (Dwyer and Jones 2000, 214;Duncan and Duncan 2003;Low 2003).…”
Section: Imaginative Geographies Of Whitenessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…. As Wiegman (1999) warns, in some cases whites have strategically used the project of making whiteness (geographically) specific as a means to deflect charges of white racism and to establish a basis for minoritarian claims by whites who can now locate themselves within trajectories of discrimination and othering, as for example, descendants of once abject Irish immigrants or Appalachian ''white trash'' (see also McGuinness 2000). infinite particularity'' (Wiegman 1999, 118).…”
Section: Imaginative Geographies Of Whitenessmentioning
confidence: 99%