2008
DOI: 10.1139/f08-144
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Geolocation of North Sea cod (Gadus morhua) using hidden Markov models and behavioural switching

Abstract: When geolocating fish based on archival tag data, a realistic assessment of uncertainty is essential. Here, we describe an application of a novel Fokker–Planck-based method to geolocate Atlantic cod ( Gadus morhua ) in the North Sea area. In this study, the geolocation relies mainly on matching tidal patterns in depth measurements when a fish spends a prolonged period of time at the seabed with a tidal database. Each day, the method provides a nonparametric probability distribution of the position of a tagged … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
114
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 102 publications
(115 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
1
114
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is likely to give a conservative estimate of location accuracy since in practice the fish may have been moving, to some extent, during these periods, so the scatter of locations we generated would be produced by a combination of geolocation errors and fish movement. The mean error estimated from our method was approximately 8 km, which accords with estimates provided from data collected by stationary tags tested in the hidden Markov model geolocation method (Pedersen et al 2008). To put this error into context, it is comparable to the worst Argos locations (Hays et al 2001b) and is an order of magnitude better than light-based geolocation (Teo et al 2004).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 75%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This is likely to give a conservative estimate of location accuracy since in practice the fish may have been moving, to some extent, during these periods, so the scatter of locations we generated would be produced by a combination of geolocation errors and fish movement. The mean error estimated from our method was approximately 8 km, which accords with estimates provided from data collected by stationary tags tested in the hidden Markov model geolocation method (Pedersen et al 2008). To put this error into context, it is comparable to the worst Argos locations (Hays et al 2001b) and is an order of magnitude better than light-based geolocation (Teo et al 2004).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 75%
“…This method is referred to as the tidal location method (TLM, as described in Metcalfe & Arnold 1997;Hunter et al 2004b). We used a novel Fokker-Planck-based method that combines the TLM with a hidden Markov model to estimate, for each day at liberty, the non-parametric probability distribution of geographic position (for details see Pedersen et al 2008).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Data from tags that were returned from recaptured cod were downloaded and the depth time series was used to estimate daily geographic location. This was done by matching the tidal and maximum depth data to known dates and locations as per the method described in Pedersen et al (2008). Temperature data from each tag were binned into 10 m depth intervals and then averaged.…”
Section: Data Sourcesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The DST is aimed to be placed on fish and when the fish are re-caught the data is read out either by physical contacts in the DST or by powering the system through a wireless interface. The data can then be used to estimate the fish migration route by geo-location [8][9][10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%