2022
DOI: 10.1109/tgrs.2020.3045088
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Geolocation of RFIs by Multiple Snapshot Difference Method for Synthetic Aperture Interferometric Radiometer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 35 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(Park et al, 2016) has discussed MUltiple SIgnal Classification direction-of-arrival estimations for RFI detection. (Jin et al, 2022b) provided a finer accuracy by noticing the difference on multiple snapshots on the premise that the location of RFI sources remains unchanged, and further addressed the low to moderate contamination cases based on the point-ripple characteristic of RFI sources (Jin et al, 2022a). The above methods of tacking RFI in the very early stage of the signal processing chain, while theoretically feasible, are very likely to propagate errors through the data flow, leading to exacerbated inaccuracies on the retrieved SSS.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(Park et al, 2016) has discussed MUltiple SIgnal Classification direction-of-arrival estimations for RFI detection. (Jin et al, 2022b) provided a finer accuracy by noticing the difference on multiple snapshots on the premise that the location of RFI sources remains unchanged, and further addressed the low to moderate contamination cases based on the point-ripple characteristic of RFI sources (Jin et al, 2022a). The above methods of tacking RFI in the very early stage of the signal processing chain, while theoretically feasible, are very likely to propagate errors through the data flow, leading to exacerbated inaccuracies on the retrieved SSS.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%