2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijggc.2019.02.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Geologic CO2 sequestration and permeability uncertainty in a highly heterogeneous reservoir

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

3
37
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
3
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The 1‐D and 2‐D model results discussed above reveal that an advancing CO 2 plume is accompanied in space and time by a positive thermal anomaly at its leading edge. This result is discordant with a recent study by Jayne et al (), which found that the positive thermal anomaly advances ahead of the CO 2 plume in a highly heterogeneous basalt reservoir. While Jayne et al () suggested that thermal monitoring may be an effective strategy for heterogeneous reservoirs, they did not provide a mechanistic explanation.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 68%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The 1‐D and 2‐D model results discussed above reveal that an advancing CO 2 plume is accompanied in space and time by a positive thermal anomaly at its leading edge. This result is discordant with a recent study by Jayne et al (), which found that the positive thermal anomaly advances ahead of the CO 2 plume in a highly heterogeneous basalt reservoir. While Jayne et al () suggested that thermal monitoring may be an effective strategy for heterogeneous reservoirs, they did not provide a mechanistic explanation.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 68%
“…This result is discordant with a recent study by Jayne et al (), which found that the positive thermal anomaly advances ahead of the CO 2 plume in a highly heterogeneous basalt reservoir. While Jayne et al () suggested that thermal monitoring may be an effective strategy for heterogeneous reservoirs, they did not provide a mechanistic explanation. As a result, we further analyzed a simulation from Jayne et al () to make the mechanistic connection between the temperature distribution in a heterogeneous reservoir and the thermodynamic processes responsible for the thermal signature discussed above.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 68%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…develop and implement ensemble simulation methods to quantify spatially variable sealing behavior within the low‐volume Snake River Plains basalts. Jayne et al . extend these methods into flood basalt formations to show how permeability uncertainty affects the injectivity and leakage during CCS in flood basalt formations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Prior studies in this area have been either specific to estimation of area of review using semianalytical solutions 37,38 for a single-phase flow using homogeneous reservoir properties or they numerically analyzed pressure/saturation on a single site to investigate other specific issues. [39][40][41][42] Another metric that provides a measure of the lateral extent of a reservoir impacted by a fluid drawdown is radius of investigation, 43 which is popular in well-test analysis of oil and gas wells, but this metric is not adequate for carbon storage reservoirs for three reasons: (1) storage reservoirs considered in this study are open boundaries (constant pressure), whereas the radius of investigation is strictly applicable to no-flow closed systems 43 ; (2) radius of investigation assumes a homogeneous and geometrically ideal (cylindrical shaped) reservoir, whereas the reservoirs for CO 2 storage can range from moderately ideal to complex in terms of their geometry and heterogeneity; and (3) radius of investigation is meant for a drainage/drawdown test in a closed reservoir, whereas the scenario simulated in this study is analogous to a buildup test with open boundaries. Despite these limitations, radius of investigation estimated through well-test analysis can be a useful measure in reservoir characterization when there is little information on reservoir properties and heterogeneities.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%