The Geology of Japan
DOI: 10.1144/goj.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Geological evolution of Japan

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 117 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…With transform motion between the Pacific Plate and Japan, SW Japan underwent a period when subduction of the Pacific plate ceased but reinitiated at 17 Ma by subduction of younger Philippine Sea plate (Kimura et al, ). The main islands of Japan, both southwest and northeast Honshu, have been characterized as an accretionary complex with granitic volcanism indicative of subduction from at least the Jurassic (Taira et al, ). Since the history of accretion is long with a number of transcurrent displacements during the Jurassic (Taira et al, ), we have assigned a broad Jurassic age range to the long‐term subduction duration, 201 to 145 Ma.…”
Section: Data Setmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…With transform motion between the Pacific Plate and Japan, SW Japan underwent a period when subduction of the Pacific plate ceased but reinitiated at 17 Ma by subduction of younger Philippine Sea plate (Kimura et al, ). The main islands of Japan, both southwest and northeast Honshu, have been characterized as an accretionary complex with granitic volcanism indicative of subduction from at least the Jurassic (Taira et al, ). Since the history of accretion is long with a number of transcurrent displacements during the Jurassic (Taira et al, ), we have assigned a broad Jurassic age range to the long‐term subduction duration, 201 to 145 Ma.…”
Section: Data Setmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main islands of Japan, both southwest and northeast Honshu, have been characterized as an accretionary complex with granitic volcanism indicative of subduction from at least the Jurassic (Taira et al, ). Since the history of accretion is long with a number of transcurrent displacements during the Jurassic (Taira et al, ), we have assigned a broad Jurassic age range to the long‐term subduction duration, 201 to 145 Ma. On Kamchatka, there is little evidence for pre–Mesozoic rocks (Watson & Fujita, ).…”
Section: Data Setmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other 3 results of ridge-approach model by Iwamori (2000), which incorporates mantle convection at depths >30 km and uses v = 6.3 cm/year, are shown by dashed bold lines labeled by the corresponding ages of the slab at trench, 2.5, 1.0 and 0 Ma. Katayama et al 2001 540 Ma Okamoto et al 2004-Miyamoto et al, 2007 ; Engebretson 89 Ma Okudaira and Yoshitake, 2004Nakajima et al, 1990;, 1991;Otsuki, 1992;, 1993;Sakaguchi, 1996;Maruyama et al, 1997;Iwamori, 2000;Aoya et al, 2003Wallis et al, 2009Nakajima et al, 2004aNakajima et al, 1990;, 199385-80 Ma Wallis et al, 2009Taira et al, 2016 89 Ma 86 Ma…”
Section: Fettes and Desmons 2007mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Japanese Islands are composed mainly of subhorizontal nappe piles of an accretionary complex of late Paleozoic-Cenozoic age and their metamorphosed equivalents (Faure 1985;Isozaki et al 1990). They are divided into several geologic units with discontinuous ages of accretion (Faure et al 1986a;Taira et al 1989;Ichikawa 1990;Isozaki & Maruyama 1991). The thrust sheets of accretionary complexes are arranged basically in the order of older toward the top (Isozaki et Isozaki & Maruyama 1991).…”
Section: Geologic Structure Of the Japanese Islandsmentioning
confidence: 99%