Geological structure and tectonic evolution of the Lower Palaeozoic rocks of the Isle of Man

Abstract

The Lower Palaeozoic sedimentary rocks of the Isle of Man, deposited near the margin of the Avalonian plate, were folded and cleaved during continental closure and collision. Although folds on a scale of several kilometres can be inferred, the large-scale structure of the Isle of Man remains uncertain in the absence of detailed and widespread biostratigraphical controls on the stratigraphy and other difficulties. A working model suggests that the island is composed of several northeast trending, strike-parallel 'tracts' separated by vertical or steeply northwest dipping faults. Stratigraphic sequences may be apparent within tracts but cannot easily be correlated between tracts. The within-tract structure is the result of two main stages of deformation (D1 and D2) and one or more localized later events (D3). F1 folds have axial surfaces which dip steeply northwest or southeast, near-horizontal hinges, and wavelengths ranging up to several kilometres. The F2 folds, seen mostly on a small scale, are reclined to recumbent and coaxial with F1 folds. The D1 and D2 structures were imposed on the Wenlock rocks of the Niarbyl Formation but are absent from the Peel Sandstone (late Silurian--early Devonian), constraining the main deformation to the Caledonian (Acadian) orogeny.The D1 structures are the products of collisional tectonics but the origin of the flat-lying D2 structures is unclear, although vertical flattening is more likely than thrusting. Most of the inferred tract-bounding structures cannot be characterized in the absence of exposure or precise stratigraphical controls. Two of them, however, are inferred to be northwest dipping faults. One of these faults cuts D1 structures whilst the other appears to be pinned by a syn-D1 intrusion, suggesting broadly syn-D 1 age. Localized, steep northeast striking zones of late to post-D 1 high strain, which are exposed on the west coast of the island, in part reflect partitioning of coaxial or transpressive deformation into the boundaries between rocks of contrasted ductility. The Niarbyl Fault Zone ('shear zone') is shown to be a belt of ductile and brittle deformation whose tectonic history and regional significance have yet to be fully resolved. Brittle thrust faults are exposed in several parts of the Isle of Man and include the Niarbyl Thrust, which, in one interpretation, is taken to separate the Niarbyl high-strain phyllonite belt from the overlying Niarbyl Formation. Most thrusts are north to northwest dipping and displacements are typically on a metre scale. Many of them may be attributed to the latest stages of the Caledonian collision processes on the basis that similar structures also deform the late Silurian-early Devonian Peel Sandstone of the Isle of Man and rocks of similar age elsewhere in the region.

Shallow geophysical and geological evidence for a regional-scale fault duplex in the Lower Palaeozoic of the Isle of Man

“…5;Quirk & Burnett 1999). Major folds verge towards the Port Erin fault on both sides (Fitches et al 1999) and deformed pebbles within the northern wall display a gently west dipping linear fabric parallel to the inferred direction of shear on the fault. A few kilometres east of here, between Port St Mary and Gansey, a set of southeast dipping thrusts occur in association with a major recumbent fold (the Gansey Fault Zone; Fig.…”

“…In only a few shear zones have kinematic indicators been observed (e.g. Quirk & Kimbell 1997;Fitches et al 1999;Holdsworth, pers. comm.).…”

“…It is, however, worth noting that the central part of the imbricate belt coincides with a change in fold vergence within the Manx Group interpreted by Lamplugh (1903) and Simpson (1963) to represent the trace of a major synclinorium (cf. Fitches et al 1999).…”

“…1). These faults are rarely observed due to poor exposure but are necessary to explain the apparent juxtaposition of different lithostratigraphic and structural domains (Fitches et al 1999;Quirk & Burnett 1999). It was after recognizing the differences between these domains that the idea of Quirk & Burnett (1999).…”

“…The objective of this paper is to compare these features in order to erect a tentative tectonic model. Detailed work on the kinematic history is required before a more rigorous structural interpretation can be developed although a start has already been made by Fitches et al (1999).…”