2019
DOI: 10.21425/f5fbg45046
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Geologically recent rearrangements in central Amazonian river network and their importance for the riverine barrier hypothesis

Abstract: Highlights • The river network in central Amazonia has changed radically during the last 100 ky. The river Japurá (Caquetá) disconnected from the Rio Negro and became a tributary of the Amazon only about 1000 years ago, and the upper reaches of both the Juruá and the Madeira have been tributaries of the Purus. • Shifting tributary arrangements create a dynamic biogeographic landscape where dispersal barriers and dispersal routes for both terrestrial and aquatic organisms are more ephemeral than has been though… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
88
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(92 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
3
88
1
Order By: Relevance
“…5, but see Maximiano et al 2020), which indicates that this river does not isolate communities as effectively as the Amazon river. Tributaries of the Amazon River are generally narrower and have been more dynamic over time (Ruokolainen et al 2019;Rossetti et al 2014;Hoorn et al 2017), which results in a weaker effect compared to the Amazon River. Our results indicate that the Amazon River, which is the oldest, widest and with the largest discharge, has a stronger effect on species distribution and observed biogeographic patterns, whereas younger and more dynamic tributaries have weaker or no effect on most biological groups (but see e.g., Maximiano et al 2020 andSilva et al 2019).…”
Section: Riverine Barriersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5, but see Maximiano et al 2020), which indicates that this river does not isolate communities as effectively as the Amazon river. Tributaries of the Amazon River are generally narrower and have been more dynamic over time (Ruokolainen et al 2019;Rossetti et al 2014;Hoorn et al 2017), which results in a weaker effect compared to the Amazon River. Our results indicate that the Amazon River, which is the oldest, widest and with the largest discharge, has a stronger effect on species distribution and observed biogeographic patterns, whereas younger and more dynamic tributaries have weaker or no effect on most biological groups (but see e.g., Maximiano et al 2020 andSilva et al 2019).…”
Section: Riverine Barriersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In other words, when we applied the Z1 randomization procedure, the removal of the sampling effect from the whole phylogeny at the scale of the entire NW Amazonia increased the capability to detect closely related species coexisting in a particular site. Thus, the NTI clustering trend suggests more recent events, such as the relatively recent change in the channel location of big and medium size rivers (Ruokolainen et al., 2019), have acted as effective geographical barriers and constrained plant dispersal. These findings also suggest that small peripheral populations isolated by distance could act as an important source of speciation (Hubbell, 2001; Rosindell et al., 2010).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Overall, the trade‐off between lineage age and the time of formation of physical barriers (e.g. big rivers) often shapes lineage distributions across geographical space (Ruokolainen et al., 2019). For lineages that originated before the presence of geographical barriers, dispersal may be paramount determining the phylogenetic structure of the whole meta‐community at large spatial scales (Dexter et al., 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The Tapajos, Madeira, and other rivers in Amazonia—which often form the boundaries between geographically adjacent taxa—may have shifted their drainage patterns periodically through the Pleistocene (Hayakawa and Rossetti ; Ruokolainen et al. ) resulting in the current allopatry between taxa that were once in contact and able to introgress. Interestingly, our sample included three individuals of D. f. neglecta that occurred on the eastern bank of the Madeira River (MPDS 616, 748, and 749 representing the first record of this taxon on the eastern bank) within the Aripaunã‐Machado mini‐interfluve.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%