2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.gexplo.2023.107220
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Geology and geochemistry of gold mineralization at the Namicupo prospect, Mozambique Belt, northeastern Mozambique

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Based on these results and fluid inclusion constraints, we suggest that the gold precipitation at the Tau deposit, either as invisible gold (first stage) or inclusions of native gold (second stage) in arsenopyrite was controlled mainly by fluid immiscibility accompanied by temperature, pressure, and sulfur fugacity changes, in addition to fluid–rock interaction. Overall, the Tau deposit exhibits similar physico‐chemical properties and formation conditions as other orogenic deposits in Archean cratond elsewhere (e.g., Groves et al, 1998; Hagemann & Cassidy, 2000; Mikucki, 1998; Nopeia et al, 2021, 2023). It also resembles formation models proposed for Archean BIF‐hosted gold deposits (e.g., Morey et al, 2008; Morales et al, 2016).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…Based on these results and fluid inclusion constraints, we suggest that the gold precipitation at the Tau deposit, either as invisible gold (first stage) or inclusions of native gold (second stage) in arsenopyrite was controlled mainly by fluid immiscibility accompanied by temperature, pressure, and sulfur fugacity changes, in addition to fluid–rock interaction. Overall, the Tau deposit exhibits similar physico‐chemical properties and formation conditions as other orogenic deposits in Archean cratond elsewhere (e.g., Groves et al, 1998; Hagemann & Cassidy, 2000; Mikucki, 1998; Nopeia et al, 2021, 2023). It also resembles formation models proposed for Archean BIF‐hosted gold deposits (e.g., Morey et al, 2008; Morales et al, 2016).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…Such types of deposits with a high content of invisible gold include Fairview (Republic of South Africa) -1400 g/t Au, Carlin (USA) -4000 g/t Au; Gegchell (USA) -2400 g/t, etc. [9]. The in-fluence of fine and dust gold, which is also contained, among other things, in sulfide and arsenide minerals, can be significant, reaching a content of 2-5 g/t for the entire ore mass [10]- [13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%