“…In their work Latapie and Lochaden (2016) have criticized the Hoek & Brown (2002) conversion method to MC parameters, citing the fact that it only uses confinement stress range up to 0.25 UCS, as a shortcoming (in the same manner as Hoek & Brown 1997 procedure), in particular for slope and retaining wall problems. They also cited the fact that Intermediate Ground materials are governed by shear strength of the rock mass, rather than by discontinuities, as is often the case for hard, more intact rocks, and Karagkounis et al (2016) have implicated that this applies to Qatari rock masses. What concerns this issue, it was already shown by Vucemilovic et al (2021) that Qatari rock masses, for most part, are not Intermediate Ground material, and even softest RUS member characteristics conform to a very limited extent to its' criteria (average UCS was recorded at 12.9 MPa and transitional HB variables' changes from Carvalho 2007 are minor as seen in table 2).…”