2002
DOI: 10.2113/gsecongeo.97.2.197
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Geology of a Major New Porphyry Copper Center in the Superior (Pioneer) District, Arizona

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…3). Proterozoic, Paleozoic, and Mesozoic sedimentary rocks, which are locally important ore hosts in certain Laramide porphyry deposits (e.g., Resolution; Manske and Paul, 2002), were denuded in the study area, most likely by erosion during uplift in the Late Cretaceous (Flowers et al, 2008).…”
Section: Rock Typesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3). Proterozoic, Paleozoic, and Mesozoic sedimentary rocks, which are locally important ore hosts in certain Laramide porphyry deposits (e.g., Resolution; Manske and Paul, 2002), were denuded in the study area, most likely by erosion during uplift in the Late Cretaceous (Flowers et al, 2008).…”
Section: Rock Typesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Magma produced enargite and other Cu minerals from high-grade veins and mantos for over 100 years, before Resolution (Inferred Mineral Resource >1.3 Bt grading >1.5 % Cu) was discovered below 800 m of post-mineralisation cover rocks and gravel during exploration for additional veins (Manske and Paul, 2002).…”
Section: Strategy and Tacticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent compilations (Singer et al, 2005a;Seedorff et al, 2005) indicate that most porphyry copper deposits are of Phanerozoic age, were emplaced at depths ranging from ~1 to 6 km (averaging 1.9 km), and have an average vertical thickness of ~2.0 km. With a few exceptions (Manske and Paul, 2002), most known deposits are within a few hundred meters of Earth's surface and part of their 2 km vertical thickness is at the surface, as defi ned by the model calculation (Fig. 2).…”
Section: Application Of the Model To Global Copper Resources Porphyrymentioning
confidence: 99%