2021
DOI: 10.1080/17445647.2021.1982032
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Geology of late-Variscan Sàrrabus pluton (south-eastern Sardinia, Italy)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Once exhumed at shallow structural levels, the Rosas Shear Zone acted as weakness and permeable zone favorable for the intrusion of mafic dyke and, soon after, for extensive granite-related fluid circulation. The ages of each step are supposed taking into account the available dating in the Sardinian basement of the regional metamorphism (~350 Ma, [68], mafic dyke intrusion (~300 Ma, [41,69,70]) and granite intrusion (~289 Ma [17,42]).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Once exhumed at shallow structural levels, the Rosas Shear Zone acted as weakness and permeable zone favorable for the intrusion of mafic dyke and, soon after, for extensive granite-related fluid circulation. The ages of each step are supposed taking into account the available dating in the Sardinian basement of the regional metamorphism (~350 Ma, [68], mafic dyke intrusion (~300 Ma, [41,69,70]) and granite intrusion (~289 Ma [17,42]).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The lower Cambrian-lower Carboniferous succession was intruded during lower Permian by numerous granitoid bodies and associated mafic and felsic dikes forming the Sulcis pluton [17] that crops out few kilometers to the SE of the RSZ (Figure 1b) and most likely occurs at shallow depth beneath the Rosas mine district (Figure 1c). In southern Sardinia, the intrusion of mafic dykes is a process that lasted for a long time span, more than 10 Ma, so dykes may pre-date, be coeval or post-date the granite body intrusion [17,41]. The outermost part of the Pluton in Northern Sulcis consists of F-bearing, ferroan ilmeniteseries, subaluminous I-type granites ("GS1 suite", [17]), dated at 289 ± 1 Ma by Re-Os on molybdenite [42].…”
Section: Stratigraphic Settingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(1) The older magmatic peak (OMP), prevalently represented in N Sardinia and referable to a period of time spanning from 322 ± 8 Ma in N Sardinia [77,78] to 299 ± 3 Ma in Central Sardinia [79]; (2) The younger magmatic peak (YMP), represented by several plutons emplaced during a shorter span of time, from 291 to 286 Ma [80][81][82].…”
Section: The Sardinia Batholithmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The dominant felsic character of magmatism appears as a primary crustal signature for the post-collisional magmatism forming the entire SCB. Magma production has been largely interpreted as related to partial melting of crustal materials and interactions of felsic melts with mafic magmas at different levels in the crust [82,83,[92][93][94][95][96][97][98][99][100]. Interactions of crustal magmas with mantle-derived melts are testified by mixing/mingling evidence resulting in hybrid varieties, and by the widespread occurrence of hornblende-pyroxene bearing mafic to tonalitic enclaves in granodiorites [82,99,100].…”
Section: The Sardinia Batholithmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2) is composed of several tectonic units, each of which is characterised by a sedimentary and volcanic succession spanning in age from the early Cambrian to the early Carboniferous. These units were affected by shortening events during Variscan collision and by post-collisional extensional tectonics, leading to uplift of the entire basement and emplacement of Variscan granitoids (Carmignani et al 1994(Carmignani et al , 2016Conti et al 1999;Conte et al 2017;Secchi et al 2021;Cocco et al 2022). The collisional events occurred with associated regional metamorphism, which ranged from very low grade in the southwestern part of the island to high grade in the northern part of the island and produced a nappe stack with dominant topto-the-SSW and subordinate top-to-the-W tectonic transport directions (Conti and Patta 1998;Conti et al 2001;Casini et al 2010;Montomoli et al 2018;Carosi et al 2022;Petroccia et al 2022aPetroccia et al , 2022b.…”
Section: Geological Settingmentioning
confidence: 99%