1950
DOI: 10.2307/1005638
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Geology of the Coastal Plain of North Carolina

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

1973
1973
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1c), stretches from Georgia (GA) to South Carolina (SC) and North Carolina (NC). Here, numerous studies dating back a half century (Richards, 1963) have identified an almost continuous scarp (Orangeburg Scarp, Ator et al, 2005;Cronin et al, 1984;Huddlestun, 1988;Winker and Howard, 1977) extending from Georgia to Virginia that is interpreted as the geomorphic imprint of the maximum middle-late Pliocene SL ingression (Huddlestun, 1988;Winker and Howard, 1977). In NC and SC the scarp is associated with the Duplin Formation, representing a warm, shallow, normal marine, inner to middle-shelf facies of Mid-Pliocene age (Parnell and Visaggi, 2011), while in northern GA coeval deposits have been associated with the Raysor Formation (Huddlestun, 1988), representing a slightly deeper marine environment than the Duplin (Markewich et al, 1992;Ward et al, 1991).…”
Section: Observed Sea-level Markersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1c), stretches from Georgia (GA) to South Carolina (SC) and North Carolina (NC). Here, numerous studies dating back a half century (Richards, 1963) have identified an almost continuous scarp (Orangeburg Scarp, Ator et al, 2005;Cronin et al, 1984;Huddlestun, 1988;Winker and Howard, 1977) extending from Georgia to Virginia that is interpreted as the geomorphic imprint of the maximum middle-late Pliocene SL ingression (Huddlestun, 1988;Winker and Howard, 1977). In NC and SC the scarp is associated with the Duplin Formation, representing a warm, shallow, normal marine, inner to middle-shelf facies of Mid-Pliocene age (Parnell and Visaggi, 2011), while in northern GA coeval deposits have been associated with the Raysor Formation (Huddlestun, 1988), representing a slightly deeper marine environment than the Duplin (Markewich et al, 1992;Ward et al, 1991).…”
Section: Observed Sea-level Markersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…But as seismic profiling and deep drilling revealed the variable depth to basement along the coastline (Richards, 1950;Spangler, 1950;Spangler and Peterson, 1950), Cederstrom's concept was transformed. Realizing that the basement was considerably higher near Ft. Monroe (across the James River from Norfolk) than to the north and south, Richards and Straley (1953) introduced the term Ft. Monroe high.…”
Section: Arches and Basinsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1). It is underlain by a series of wedge-shaped strata of poorly consolidated materials approximately 660 m deep, lying over crystalline basement rock (Richards 1950) . These strata, including the Pungo River formation, an interbedded layer of phosphatic and nonphosphatic sands, silts, clays, and limestones, were produced by a series of Tertiary submergences and emergences (Kimrey 1965, Stuckey 1965.…”
Section: Geology and Soilsmentioning
confidence: 99%