2010
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4419-7955-1_7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Geomagnetic Jerks: Rapid Core Field Variations and Core Dynamics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
49
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 96 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 78 publications
4
49
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[29] From the invoked hypothesis, we have confirmed the presence of all the geomagnetic jerks detected by different authors via different methods [see Mandea et al, 2010]. For example, the 1700/ 1708, 1730/1741, 1750/1763, 1870/1861, 1889/ 1901, 1925/1932 events (each couple XX/YY, XX indicates an event from Alexandrescu et al [1997] and YY from Korte et al [2009], is thought to represent the same event because of the time offset suggested by Korte et al [2009]), have been confirmed by our analysis.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 69%
“…[29] From the invoked hypothesis, we have confirmed the presence of all the geomagnetic jerks detected by different authors via different methods [see Mandea et al, 2010]. For example, the 1700/ 1708, 1730/1741, 1750/1763, 1870/1861, 1889/ 1901, 1925/1932 events (each couple XX/YY, XX indicates an event from Alexandrescu et al [1997] and YY from Korte et al [2009], is thought to represent the same event because of the time offset suggested by Korte et al [2009]), have been confirmed by our analysis.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 69%
“…One of the most important results from high-resolution satellite geomagnetic field models is how they render geomagnetic jerks, or abrupt discontinuities in the SA of internal origin that have been initially identified in earlier ground observatory records (see e.g. Mandea et al, 2010). The 2003 and 2007 jerks have been related to the existence of a short-lived, intense pulse in the SA energy at the core-mantle boundary (Chulliat et al, 2010b), occurring around 2006 close to the equator.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The projection from internal wave motions to the SV is rather complicated, as discussed in the context of Earth's fluid core. TWs may contribute to the occurrence of geomagnetic jerks; they cannot however account for all phenomena alone (see [29] for a review). Nevertheless, an increase of spatial and temporal coverage in magnetic data is expected to better resolve the SV and inverted flow models on the top of the metallic region.…”
Section: Concluding Remarks and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%