2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.pepi.2011.05.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Geomagnetic secular variation recorded by sediments deposited during the Cretaceous normal superchron at low latitude

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 75 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To obtain accurate paleolatitudes, we have to not only make exact structural corrections but also average out paleosecular variation. Noticeably, although it is controversial whether the VGP scatter ( S value) is a suitable parameter for quantifying paleosecular variation [ Linder and Gilder , , ], a widely accepted approach is to compare the VGP scatter with those expected by McFadden et al []. Considering that more than 99% of specimens yield normal polarities and their U‐Pb zircon ages range from 132.0 ± 2.0 Ma to 120.0 ± 1.0 Ma, we compared the VGP scatter of the Early Cretaceous Qushenla Fm volcanic rocks with the expected value of the CNPS.…”
Section: Averaging Out Paleosecular Variationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To obtain accurate paleolatitudes, we have to not only make exact structural corrections but also average out paleosecular variation. Noticeably, although it is controversial whether the VGP scatter ( S value) is a suitable parameter for quantifying paleosecular variation [ Linder and Gilder , , ], a widely accepted approach is to compare the VGP scatter with those expected by McFadden et al []. Considering that more than 99% of specimens yield normal polarities and their U‐Pb zircon ages range from 132.0 ± 2.0 Ma to 120.0 ± 1.0 Ma, we compared the VGP scatter of the Early Cretaceous Qushenla Fm volcanic rocks with the expected value of the CNPS.…”
Section: Averaging Out Paleosecular Variationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another way to quantify geomagnetic secular variation is through the dispersion in palaeomagnetic directions or poles. Some results suggest relatively low field variability during the CNS than before or after it [ McFadden et al , ], although the interpretation is sometimes equivocal due to the latitudinal dependency of the angular dispersion and problems with how variability is defined [ Biggin et al , ; Linder and Gilder , ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…• Table S1 • Table S2 • Table S3 • is sometimes equivocal due to the latitudinal dependency of the angular dispersion and problems with how variability is defined [Biggin et al, 2008;Linder and Gilder, 2011].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, important perturbations in the global carbon cycle, the development of large igneous provinces (LIPs) such as the Kerguelen Plateau and Rajmahal Traps, and an increase of the global sea level have also been recognized (e.g., Leckie et al, 2002;Courtillot and Renne, 2003;Haq, 2014). These changes affected the distribution and evolution of marine ecosystems on a worldwide scale (e.g., Dias-Brito, 1987;Riccardi, 1991;Leckie et al, 2002;Browning and Watkins, 2008;Huber and Leckie, 2011;McAnena et al, 2013;Coccioni et al, 2014;Dummann et al, 2020). This interval contains multiple black shale horizons associated with oceanic anoxic events (OAEs) such as the Selli, 113/Jacob, Kilian, Urbino/Paquier, and Leenhardt events (e.g., Erbacher et al, 1999;Leckie et al, 2002;Browning and Watkins, 2008;Jenkyns, 2010;Coccioni et al, 2014;Sabatino et al, 2015Sabatino et al, , 2018Bottini and Erba, 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%