1961
DOI: 10.1029/jz066i012p04027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Geomagnetically trapped electrons from cosmic ray albedo neutrons

Abstract: The ability of the cosmic‐ray neutron albedo mechanism to account for geomagnetically trapped electrons is investigated quantitatively. Injection as a function of energy, pitch angle, and altitude is computed from a reasonable neutron albedo model. Loss mechanisms (slowing down and pitch‐angle diffusion) based on Coulomb interactions with the residual atmosphere are considered to act both independently and simultaneously. It is found that slowing down is generally dominant. The resulting electron belt has the … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
114
0

Year Published

1976
1976
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 117 publications
(115 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
1
114
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In order to investigate the temporal evolution of outer zone relativistic electron pitch angle distribution due to EMIC wave scattering, we perform the 1-D pure pitch angle diffusion simulations [e.g., Meredith et al, 2006;Thorne et al, 2013;Ni et al, 2013Ni et al, , 2014aNi et al, , 2014b by numerically solving the equation where f is the phase space density (PSD), t is the time, and the electron bounce period is approximated as Lenchek et al, 1961]. The upper boundary condition for PSD in a eq space is set as ∂f ∂α eq α eq ¼ 90°À Á ¼ 0, and the corresponding lower boundary condition is set as ∂f ∂α eq α eq ¼ 0°À Á ¼ 0 for the strong diffusion and as f(α eq ≤ α LC ) = 0 (where α LC is the equatorial loss cone angle) for the weak diffusion.…”
Section: Pure Pitch Angle Diffusion Simulations and Electron Loss Timmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to investigate the temporal evolution of outer zone relativistic electron pitch angle distribution due to EMIC wave scattering, we perform the 1-D pure pitch angle diffusion simulations [e.g., Meredith et al, 2006;Thorne et al, 2013;Ni et al, 2013Ni et al, , 2014aNi et al, , 2014b by numerically solving the equation where f is the phase space density (PSD), t is the time, and the electron bounce period is approximated as Lenchek et al, 1961]. The upper boundary condition for PSD in a eq space is set as ∂f ∂α eq α eq ¼ 90°À Á ¼ 0, and the corresponding lower boundary condition is set as ∂f ∂α eq α eq ¼ 0°À Á ¼ 0 for the strong diffusion and as f(α eq ≤ α LC ) = 0 (where α LC is the equatorial loss cone angle) for the weak diffusion.…”
Section: Pure Pitch Angle Diffusion Simulations and Electron Loss Timmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(17). In a dipolar field, the normalized S 0 , as a quarter-bounce integral, has been investigated in detail by Lenchek et al (1961) and Davidson (1976) and recently revisited by Orlova and Shprits (2011). Two good empirical approximations of S 0 in terms of sin α eq , S 0 ≈ 1.30 − 0.56 sin α eq (29) with an error within 4.5 % and…”
Section: Bounce Period Related Term Smentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared to the results in a dipolar field, the degree of decrease in S 0 increases considerably with equatorial pitch angle, varying from ∼1 % at α eq ≈ 0 • to >50 % at α eq ≈ 90 • . Based upon the previous studies (e.g., Lenchek et al, 1961;Schulz and Lanzerotti, 1974;Davidson, 1976;Orlova and Shprits, 2011), we have adopted a fifthorder polynomial of sin α eq , S 0 α eq = a 5 sin α eq 5 +a 4 sin α eq 4 +a 3 sin α eq 3 +a 2 sin α eq 2 +a 1 sin α eq +a 0 ,…”
Section: Bounce Period Related Term Smentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a dipole field, S(α eq ) can be approximated by S(α eq ) = 1.38 − 0.32sinα eq −0.32 sinα eq (e.g., Lenchek et al, 1961;Orlova and Shprits, 2011). In general, S(α eq ) is given as:…”
Section: Bounce Averaged Diffusion Coefficients and Fokkerplanck Diffmentioning
confidence: 99%