2013
DOI: 10.1049/iet-cta.2012.0919
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Geometric approach for observability and accessibility of discrete‐time non‐linear switched impulsive systems

Abstract: This study is concerned with observability and accessibility of discrete-time non-linear switched impulsive systems, for which the problem is more complicated than that for general discrete systems and has novel features. A new method from the combination of differential geometric theory and Lie group analysis is developed. Specifically, under the geometric framework of the system, infinitesimal invariance for the observability and accessibility is investigated, respectively. Based on the invariance investigat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…By Theorems 4.1‐ 4.2, the impulsive observer () can let the error efalse(tfalse)$$ e(t) $$ completely trend to zero even if limsuptfalse‖vfalse(tfalse)false‖>0$$ \lim \underset{t\to \infty }{\sup}\left\Vert v(t)\right\Vert >0 $$. Hence, the impulsive observer (), which has nonidentical structure with (), can let the estimated state truex^false(tfalse)$$ \hat{x}(t) $$ completely track the observed system's state xfalse(tfalse)$$ x(t) $$, not just track the state within an error bound as in Zhao and Sun [30] and LIO () and (). (ii) The unknown input v$$ v $$ no longer exists in the error system ().…”
Section: Impulsive Observers For Eliminable Unknown Inputmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…By Theorems 4.1‐ 4.2, the impulsive observer () can let the error efalse(tfalse)$$ e(t) $$ completely trend to zero even if limsuptfalse‖vfalse(tfalse)false‖>0$$ \lim \underset{t\to \infty }{\sup}\left\Vert v(t)\right\Vert >0 $$. Hence, the impulsive observer (), which has nonidentical structure with (), can let the estimated state truex^false(tfalse)$$ \hat{x}(t) $$ completely track the observed system's state xfalse(tfalse)$$ x(t) $$, not just track the state within an error bound as in Zhao and Sun [30] and LIO () and (). (ii) The unknown input v$$ v $$ no longer exists in the error system ().…”
Section: Impulsive Observers For Eliminable Unknown Inputmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here, the impulsive observers are designed for both stabilizing and destabilizing impulses. Thirdly, the impulsive observer (e.g., previous studies [24–30, 32, 34, 36]) usually requires both the observed system and the observer to have identical dynamic structure. Here, in the second type of observers, they are allowed to have nonidentical dynamic structures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Assume the system state does not jump at the switching instants. Switched systems with state jumps are called impulsive systems or switched impulsive systems in the literature [38][39][40][41].…”
Section: Problem Statementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although plentiful results have been established in observability and observers design for switched systems without UIs (see, e.g. [24–28] and the references therein), the problem of observers design for switched systems with UIs is much less mature. In [29], a structured state observer was designed for discrete‐time switched systems with UIs under arbitrary switching, and the global convergence of the error dynamics was analysed via switched Lyapunov function method and linear matrix inequality (LMI) technique.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%