2021
DOI: 10.3390/universe7060174
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Geometric Approach to Analytic Marginalisation of the Likelihood Ratio for Continuous Gravitational Wave Searches

Karl Wette

Abstract: The likelihood ratio for a continuous gravitational wave signal is viewed geometrically as a function of the orientation of two vectors; one representing the optimal signal-to-noise ratio, and the other representing the maximised likelihood ratio or F-statistic. Analytic marginalisation over the angle between the vectors yields a marginalised likelihood ratio, which is a function of the F-statistic. Further analytic marginalisation over the optimal signal-to-noise ratio is explored using different choices of p… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…An alternative derivation of the F-statistic as a Bayes factor [11] reveals the underlying amplitude priors to be unphysical, which is why the F-statistic is not statistically optimal. The main advantage of the F-statistic is the analytical elimination of the four amplitude parameters, which gives it a computational advantage over any alternative that would require explicit numerical operations to deal with the unknown amplitude parameters (e.g., see [12][13][14] for further discussion).…”
Section: B the Coherent F-statisticmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An alternative derivation of the F-statistic as a Bayes factor [11] reveals the underlying amplitude priors to be unphysical, which is why the F-statistic is not statistically optimal. The main advantage of the F-statistic is the analytical elimination of the four amplitude parameters, which gives it a computational advantage over any alternative that would require explicit numerical operations to deal with the unknown amplitude parameters (e.g., see [12][13][14] for further discussion).…”
Section: B the Coherent F-statisticmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The F -statistic is a standard detection statistic for CW signals. Initially derived as a maximum-likelihood estimator with respect to amplitude parameters [21,70], it was later rederived in a Bayesian context as a Bayes factor, gauging the presence (or lack) of a signal in a Gaussian noise data stream, in which amplitude parameters are marginalized using a rather unphysical set of amplitude priors [71][72][73][74][75][76]. This detection statistic can be extended for more generic types of sources, such as binary white-dwarf systems [77] or the inspiral phase of binary black-hole coalescences [78].…”
Section: F -Statistic Searchesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The F -statistic is a standard detection statistic for CW signals. Initially derived as a maximum-likelihood estimator with respect to amplitude parameters [21,70], it was later rederived in a Bayesian context as a Bayes factor, gauging the presence (or lack) of a signal in a Gaussian noise data stream, in which amplitude parameters are marginalized using a rather unphysical set of amplitude priors [71][72][73][74][75][76]. This detection statistic can be extended for more generic types of sources, such as binary white-dwarf systems [77] or the inspiral phase of binary black-hole coalescenses [78].…”
Section: F -Statistic Searchesmentioning
confidence: 99%