1992
DOI: 10.1093/qmath/43.1.97
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Geometric Behaviour of Kleinian Groups on Boundaries for Deformation Spaces

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
21
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We will use a construction outlined by Kerckho and Thurston [16] (and later generalized by Ohshika [24], Bonahon-Otal [3] and Comar [8]) which was originally used to produce a sequence of discrete, faithful representations of a surface group whose geometric limit properly contains its algebraic limit.…”
Section: The Examplesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We will use a construction outlined by Kerckho and Thurston [16] (and later generalized by Ohshika [24], Bonahon-Otal [3] and Comar [8]) which was originally used to produce a sequence of discrete, faithful representations of a surface group whose geometric limit properly contains its algebraic limit.…”
Section: The Examplesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(See [7,13,14] for more information about algebraic convergence of Kleinian groups.) In many situations (see [1,6,15,24,25,27]), it has been shown that N n must be homeomorphic to N for all large enough n, and we had suspected that this would always be the case. In this paper, we give a collection of examples where N n is not homeomorphic to N for any n. Our sequences are quite well-behaved: the n ( 1 (M )) are convex co-compact and mutually quasiconformally conjugate, and the algebraic limit ( 1 (M )) is geometrically ÿnite.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Since .M / 0 has only one end by Lemma 6.11, which is topologically tame, q must be finite-sheeted by Canary's covering theorem [17]. This implies that D G 1 by the argument in Section 9.3 in Thurston [58] (see Lemma 2.3 in Ohshika [46] for a detailed proof).…”
Section: Claim 613mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By the covering theorem due to Thurston [28] (see also Canary [3], Ohshika [23]), there is a neighbourhoodẼ ∞ ofẽ ∞ homeomorphic to S × R such that q|Ẽ ∞ is a finite-sheeted covering. In our situation, this finite-sheeted covering must be one-toone, for the following reason.…”
Section: The First Alternative Holds If and Only If ι(ν) Is An Endingmentioning
confidence: 99%