2012
DOI: 10.1007/s00229-012-0599-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Geometric Bogomolov conjecture for abelian varieties and some results for those with some degeneration (with an appendix by Walter Gubler: the minimal dimension of a canonical measure)

Abstract: In this paper, we formulate the geometric Bogomolov conjecture for abelian varieties, and give some partial answers to it. In fact, we insist in a main theorem that under some degeneracy condition, a closed subvariety of an abelian variety does not have a dense subset of small points if it is a non-special subvariety. The key of the proof is the study of the minimal dimension of the components of a canonical measure on the tropicalization of the closed subvariety. Then we can apply the tropical version of equi… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
46
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

4
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
1
46
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Conjecture 1.5 (Conjecture 2.9 of [29]). Let A be an abelian variety over K. Let X be a closed subvariety of A.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conjecture 1.5 (Conjecture 2.9 of [29]). Let A be an abelian variety over K. Let X be a closed subvariety of A.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unlike the arithmetic cases, some abelian varieties over function fields actually have closed subvarieties which are not torsion subvarieties but have dense small points. Taking into account that fact, we have proposed in [6] [6]). Let A be an abelian variety over K. Let X be a closed subvariety of A.…”
Section: Definition 22])mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here, we recall the definition of special subvarieties defined in [6]. To define them, we use the K/k-trace of A.…”
Section: Definition 22])mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It follows from [21, Lemma 2.1] that whether or not X(ǫ; L) is dense in X for any ǫ > 0 does not depend on the choice of even ample L. Therefore, it makes sense to say that X has dense small points if X(ǫ; L) is dense in X for any ǫ > 0 and for some (and hence any) even ample line bundle L on A (cf. [21,Definition 2.2]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%