2002
DOI: 10.1215/s0012-7094-02-11333-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Geometric branched covers between generalized manifolds

Abstract: We develop a theory of geometrically controlled branched covering maps between metric spaces that are generalized cohomology manifolds. Our notion extends that of maps of bounded length distortion, or BLD-maps, from Euclidean spaces. We give a construction that generalizes an extension theorem for branched covers by I. Berstein and A. Edmonds. We apply the theory and the construction to show that certain reasonable metric spaces that were shown by S. Semmes not to admit bi-Lipschitz parametrizations by a Eucli… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

6
89
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(95 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
6
89
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We remark that the regularity of f(Bf) being a CW‐complex is not enough for our main results. The quasiregular mappings constructed by Heinonen and Rickman in [13] and [12] also have CW‐complex branch sets but otherwise behave pathologically. In particular, the boundaries of normal domains are not manifolds in those examples.…”
Section: Reverse Implicationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We remark that the regularity of f(Bf) being a CW‐complex is not enough for our main results. The quasiregular mappings constructed by Heinonen and Rickman in [13] and [12] also have CW‐complex branch sets but otherwise behave pathologically. In particular, the boundaries of normal domains are not manifolds in those examples.…”
Section: Reverse Implicationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The set double-struckS3ffalse(Bffalse) is not simply connected. So, as a Cantor set with a topologically nontrivial complement, the set f(Bf) cannot be contained in a codimension 2 simplicial complex (see [13] and [12]). Here a wild Cantor set refers to any Cantor set C in Rn such that there is no homeomorphism h:double-struckRndouble-struckRn for which hfalse(Cfalse)R×{0}n1.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Roughly speaking, ϑ is a local coframe with weak regularity and an essentially nondegenerate volume density, and the integration of ϑ along segments gives rise to a branched covering map F ϑ . Heinonen-Rickman [14] and Heinonen-Sullivan [15] proved that the local smoothability of a Lipschitz manifold is equivalent to that the local degree of F ϑ = 1; furthermore, Heinonen-Keith [13] established its equivalence with the Sobolev regularity condition ϑ ∈ W 1,2 loc . In a recent paper [17], a brand-new perspective has been adopted by Kondo-Tanaka to approach the smoothability problem.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this note we present a simple, new proof of Theorem 1.2, which also establishes its converse at the same strike. Our proof is based on the geometric measure theoretic studies on the smoothability problem (see [27,28,29,14,15,13]). In particular, we make crucial use of the results due to Heinonen-Keith [13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These sets have very rich and complex topological and geometrical structures both of which have been studied in a variety of different contexts, see e.g. [1,2,12,13,14,25,35] and references there.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%