“…Systematic analysis of over 700 clay objects, considering object form, use-wear, immediate contextual deposition and broader spatial and temporal patterning, finds no support for the interpretation of these items as information storage tools at Çatalhöyük. Furthermore, the study of the distribution of clay objects across the wider Neolithic Near East, reveals little indication of correlations between site type, size, complexity and lifestyle, as would be expected (Bennison-Chapman 2013). At Çatalhöyük, there is no evidence for the use of small geometric clay objects as "tokens"symbols used to represent goods or produce, and to retain information for retrieval at a later point in time.…”