2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.susc.2022.122067
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Geometric effect of high-resolution electron energy loss spectroscopy on the identification of plasmons: An example of graphene

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In Bi-2212 [12,47,48] and Bi-2201 [12], HREELS measurements at long wavelengths have observed a broad responsei.e., broader than the plasmon peak in Bi-2212 inferred via optical means [12,[49][50][51] -across energies below the (bulk) optical plasma frequency. Unfortunately, the low energies of incident electrons in these HREELS experiments skews the spectrum at long wavelengths, rendering the precise surface loss function difficult to extract from an experimental intensity [12,52,53]. Including the small, but finite [54], out of plane conduction between copper oxide layers pushes the q → 0 acoustic plasma frequency to a finite value [13]; indeed, this state of affairs appears to be supported by RIXS [6][7][8][9].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Bi-2212 [12,47,48] and Bi-2201 [12], HREELS measurements at long wavelengths have observed a broad responsei.e., broader than the plasmon peak in Bi-2212 inferred via optical means [12,[49][50][51] -across energies below the (bulk) optical plasma frequency. Unfortunately, the low energies of incident electrons in these HREELS experiments skews the spectrum at long wavelengths, rendering the precise surface loss function difficult to extract from an experimental intensity [12,52,53]. Including the small, but finite [54], out of plane conduction between copper oxide layers pushes the q → 0 acoustic plasma frequency to a finite value [13]; indeed, this state of affairs appears to be supported by RIXS [6][7][8][9].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is noteworthy that, under certain conditions, neglecting the effects of the Coulomb matrix element can result in an artificially dispersing loss peak with dispersion velocity equal to the velocity of the incident probe electron (27.6 eV Å for a 50 eV electron). This artefact arises owing to the combination of geometry and the Coulomb matrix element, and only occurs when the magnitude of the probe electron’s momentum perpendicular to the surface is larger after scattering (that is, backward scattering) 41 . We avoid this geometric artefact by both dividing out the Coulomb matrix element and always working in the forward-scattering geometry where the magnitude of the outgoing momentum perpendicular to the surface is smaller after scattering 34 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%