2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.mambio.2006.02.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Geometric morphometric analysis of geographic variation in the Río Negro tuco-tuco, Ctenomys rionegrensis (Rodentia: Ctenomyidae)

Abstract: A fundamental issue in the study of intraspecific variation is the analysis of how it is allocated within and between local populations. The genus Ctenomys represents an excellent model for studying such kinds of phenomena, and Ctenomys rionegrensis is particularly interesting for the study of the processes driving geographic differentiation. This species occupies a relatively small area in Uruguay, where it is restricted to sand dunes. Throughout its distribution, these ''tuco-tucos'' show conspicuous phenoty… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…At present, only one study has formally evaluated the relationship between skull shape variation and geographic distances in the genus Ctenomys (D'Anatro & Lessa, 2006). We found a weak but significant association between morphometric and geographic distances, and the results obtained suggest that differences among populations follow a mild pattern of isolation-by-distance (less than 10% of the phenotypic covariance) for the analysis using the total range of the distribution.…”
Section: Isolation-by-distancementioning
confidence: 69%
“…At present, only one study has formally evaluated the relationship between skull shape variation and geographic distances in the genus Ctenomys (D'Anatro & Lessa, 2006). We found a weak but significant association between morphometric and geographic distances, and the results obtained suggest that differences among populations follow a mild pattern of isolation-by-distance (less than 10% of the phenotypic covariance) for the analysis using the total range of the distribution.…”
Section: Isolation-by-distancementioning
confidence: 69%
“…Institution abbreviation: CMM ¼ University of Colorado Museum of Natural History. species (Ruedi 1995, Hoofer et al 1999, D'Anatro & Lessa 2006, Jansa et al 2008, Bachanek & Postawa 2010, Conroy & Gupta 2011, Shahabi et al 2011, and using this method, we were able to robustly differentiate between Colorado specimens of Reithrodontomys megalotis and R. montanus (Fig. 1).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…The geometric morphometrics of the cranium shape was captured by a configuration of topographically corresponding landmarks modified from D'Anatro and Lessa (2006). Each cranium was photographed in dorsal, ventral, and lateral views, using a digital camera with 3.1 megapixels (2048 x 1536) of resolution, macro function, and without zoom or flash.…”
Section: Geometric Morphometric Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%