Joint Urban Remote Sensing Event 2013 2013
DOI: 10.1109/jurse.2013.6550701
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Geometric primitive extraction for 3D reconstruction of urban areas from tomographic SAR data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This corresponds to the method presented in (D'Hondt et al, 2013a). In this case, several buildings are not well separated from the ground.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This corresponds to the method presented in (D'Hondt et al, 2013a). In this case, several buildings are not well separated from the ground.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…First attempts to automatically interpret such data are geometric primitive extraction from airborne data (D'Hondt et al, 2013a) and facade extraction from very high resolution spaceborne data (Shahzad and Zhu, 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It has been successfully used for the reconstruction of the vertical structure of forest [22,23], ice subsurface imaging [24], and the reconstruction of urban objects (e.g., in [25,26]). While most works focus either on the generation of TomoSAR data or on its geometric processing, e.g., regularization [27], geometric primitive extraction [28,29], or object modelling [30], only a few works address semantic analysis. Recently, TomoSAR descriptors have been proposed in [31] for the classification of forest development stages.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Object reconstruction from spaceborne TomoSAR point cloud has been recently started (D'Hondt et al, 2013) (Shahzad and Zhu, 2015a) (Fornaro et al, 2014). These point clouds have point density in the range of 600,000 ~ 1,000,000 points/km 2 and are associated with some characteristics that are worth to mention (Zhu and Shahzad, 2014): 1) TomoSAR point clouds deliver moderate 3D positioning accuracy on the order of 1 m; 2) Few number of images and limited orbit spread render the location error of TomoSAR points highly anisotropic, with an elevation error typically one or two orders of magnitude higher than in range and azimuth (Zhu and Bamler, 2012); 3) Due to the coherent imaging nature, temporally incoherent objects such as trees cannot be reconstructed from multipass spaceborne SAR image stacks; 4) TomoSAR point clouds possess much higher density of points on the building façades due to side looking SAR geometry enabling systematic reconstruction of buildings footprint via façade points analysis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%