2012
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-29793-9_10
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Geometric-Semantical Consistency Validation of CityGML Models

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
27
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There is also a need in future standards to explicitly define the consistent handling of shared building parts and the subsequent assignment of the parent building identifiers. This is a practical demonstration of the requirement for semantic checks on the relationship between building and building parts as described by Wagner et al (2013b). In summary, the metric is useful in revealing the minimum dimensions of a modelled feature if the data is relatively clean and consistent, but by assessing the frequency distribution, it is useful for identifying inconsistencies and errors derived from the modelling process.…”
Section: Minimum Size Metricsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…There is also a need in future standards to explicitly define the consistent handling of shared building parts and the subsequent assignment of the parent building identifiers. This is a practical demonstration of the requirement for semantic checks on the relationship between building and building parts as described by Wagner et al (2013b). In summary, the metric is useful in revealing the minimum dimensions of a modelled feature if the data is relatively clean and consistent, but by assessing the frequency distribution, it is useful for identifying inconsistencies and errors derived from the modelling process.…”
Section: Minimum Size Metricsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…data types) These tools include FZK Viewer (http://iaitypo3.iai.fzk.de/www-extern/index.php?id=1931), Val3dity (Biljecki, et. al, 2016), 3D CityDB Importer/Exporter (http://www.3dcitydb.org/), CityDoctor (Wagner, et. al, 2013) and FME.…”
Section: D Vegetationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One is to repair the given geometry by applying topological reasoning (cf. (Zhao et al, 2014), (Wagner et al, 2013), (Bogdahn and Coors, 2010)). Due to the complexity of the objects, this problem still exists; the problem of reconstructing the missing surfaces in a fully automatic way is not completely solved yet.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%