Search citation statements
Paper Sections
Citation Types
Year Published
Publication Types
Relationship
Authors
Journals
Incremental hole flanging by industrial robots requires an accurate estimation of process forces to ensure the safe use of robots and develop tool path strategies that enable defect-free forming. Existing analytical models for force prediction in single-point incremental forming (SPIF) usually predict only the maximum process force, which is insufficient for real-time force prediction necessary for process control. This research investigates the application of neural network models for real-time prediction of the process forces in hole flanging by incremental forming. Experiments and finite element simulations (synthetic data) serve as training data to compare the performance of four time series machine learning (ML) algorithms: a nonlinear autoregressive model with exogenous inputs (NARX), a convolutional neural network (CNN), a long short-term memory (LSTM), and a hybrid CNN-LSTM neural network in predicting real-time forces. The experimental forces predicted by the NARX had a regression ($$\:{R}^{2}$$) of 0.998, while the other ML algorithms achieved $$\:{R}^{2}$$ greater than 0.75, indicating strong correlations between the predicted and measured data. All the ML algorithms trained on synthetic data achieved $$\:{R}^{2}$$ greater than 0.98. Surrogate models built by the integration of synthetic to experiment data led to a decline in the performance of the ML models compared to models composed of only experimental data. The NARX model exhibits superior performance in the investigated scenarios and can be applied to predict online process forces while minimizing experimental effort through the utilization of synthetic data.
Incremental hole flanging by industrial robots requires an accurate estimation of process forces to ensure the safe use of robots and develop tool path strategies that enable defect-free forming. Existing analytical models for force prediction in single-point incremental forming (SPIF) usually predict only the maximum process force, which is insufficient for real-time force prediction necessary for process control. This research investigates the application of neural network models for real-time prediction of the process forces in hole flanging by incremental forming. Experiments and finite element simulations (synthetic data) serve as training data to compare the performance of four time series machine learning (ML) algorithms: a nonlinear autoregressive model with exogenous inputs (NARX), a convolutional neural network (CNN), a long short-term memory (LSTM), and a hybrid CNN-LSTM neural network in predicting real-time forces. The experimental forces predicted by the NARX had a regression ($$\:{R}^{2}$$) of 0.998, while the other ML algorithms achieved $$\:{R}^{2}$$ greater than 0.75, indicating strong correlations between the predicted and measured data. All the ML algorithms trained on synthetic data achieved $$\:{R}^{2}$$ greater than 0.98. Surrogate models built by the integration of synthetic to experiment data led to a decline in the performance of the ML models compared to models composed of only experimental data. The NARX model exhibits superior performance in the investigated scenarios and can be applied to predict online process forces while minimizing experimental effort through the utilization of synthetic data.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.