2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.susc.2004.07.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Geometric structure and chemical bonding of acetylene adsorbed on Cu(110)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These states are similar to the states formed upon adsorption of, for instance, ethylene and acetylene. 50,51 The 4σ state shows up at 9.8 eV with equal contributions both in-and out-of the surface plane, as would be expected for a state with mainly σ character for the tilted molecule. From 5 eV up towards the Fermi level there is intensity in the outof-plane spectra on both the C K and O K edges.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 53%
“…These states are similar to the states formed upon adsorption of, for instance, ethylene and acetylene. 50,51 The 4σ state shows up at 9.8 eV with equal contributions both in-and out-of the surface plane, as would be expected for a state with mainly σ character for the tilted molecule. From 5 eV up towards the Fermi level there is intensity in the outof-plane spectra on both the C K and O K edges.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 53%
“…2; alternative structures resulted in less satisfactory agreement. To get good quantitative agreement, which can be expected based on previous work [3,28], several calculations were performed where the molecule-metal (C-Pt) distance and the distance between the carbon and hydrogen atom pointing towards the surface (C-H d ) were changed independently in a twodimensional space. Relaxation of the rest of the hydrogen atoms was performed for a few cases and leads to a slight flattening of the molecule, as can be expected when weakening a C-H bond.…”
mentioning
confidence: 74%
“…Figure 3 shows the charge density difference between the adsorbate system and the separated molecule and cluster. This is an established type of analysis, which can be used [3,28,31] to deduce electron rearrangements upon interaction with the surface. The charge density difference is plotted in Fig.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This linear increase in adsorption energy with the chain length has been interpreted in terms of bonding configurations in which the alkane chains lie parallel to the metal surface [2,[20][21][22][23]. For unsaturated hydrocarbons such as ethylene and acetylene, their adsorption on metal surfaces in general can be described within the Dewar-Chatt-Duncanson chemisorption model, in which the bonding is formed via a π-donation from the adsorbate into empty metal-states coupled with back-donation from the metal into the empty orbital of the hydrocarbon [24][25][26][27][28]. This bonding configuration entails a rehybridization of the carbon atoms, which results in a C-C bond elongation and an upward "bending" of the hydrogen atoms from the surface [24][25][26][27][28].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%