2010
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.81.153404
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Geometric structure ofTiO2(110)(1×1): Confirming experimental conclusions

Abstract: Low-energy electron-diffraction and surface x-ray diffraction data acquired from TiO 2 ͑110͒͑1 ϫ 1͒ are reanalyzed to confirm the integrity of the previously reported optimized geometries. This work is performed in response to ab initio density-functional theory calculations that suggest that the atomic displacements determined from low-energy electron-diffraction measurements may be compromised by the limited number of optimized atom positions. Performing structural optimizations as a function of depth into t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

5
41
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
5
41
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[103] conflicted with later low‐energy electron diffraction [ 105 ] and ion scattering [ 106 ] studies, in particular with the position of the oxygen bridging the top two planes. It appears that recent CTR measurements and re‐analyses [ 107,108 ] resolved the discrepancy, corroborating the later measurements. A 2 × 1 reconstruction of the rutile TiO 2 surface also exists, and CTR studies found that it behaves similarly to the (001) surface.…”
Section: Applicationssupporting
confidence: 64%
“…[103] conflicted with later low‐energy electron diffraction [ 105 ] and ion scattering [ 106 ] studies, in particular with the position of the oxygen bridging the top two planes. It appears that recent CTR measurements and re‐analyses [ 107,108 ] resolved the discrepancy, corroborating the later measurements. A 2 × 1 reconstruction of the rutile TiO 2 surface also exists, and CTR studies found that it behaves similarly to the (001) surface.…”
Section: Applicationssupporting
confidence: 64%
“…The geometry of the clusters has been frozen to the experimental geometry of the TiO 2 (110)-(1×1) surface. 58 This approach is justified by the fact that only minor surface ion displacements upon helium physisorption were observed (0.0013Å as much). 3 The cluster of stoichiometry (…”
Section: Applied Methods and Computational Detailsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the relaxed TiO 2 (110)-(1×1) surface, the atomic positions are considerably displaced as compared with ideal bulk-terminated positions. According to a very recent analysis of low-energy electrondiffraction and surface x-ray diffraction data obtained from the TiO 2 (110)-(1×1) surface, 46 the Ti(5f) atoms beneath the basal plane by 0.11 ± 0.01 Å whereas the bridging oxygen atoms experience a vertical displacement away from the bulk of 0.10 ± 0.04 Å (see also Fig. 1).…”
Section: He@tio 2 (110)-(1 × 1) Potential Energy Surfacementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The atomic positions within the slab were fixed to these experimental-based values. 46 The Cartesian coordinate axes were defined in such a way that x, y, and z correspond to the [001], [110], and [110] crystallographic directions with the origin at the deepest atomic site in the basal plane (the Ti(5f) site). The sampling of the three-dimensional V(x, y, z) PES was obtained by choosing the helium lateral positions (x, y) on an equally spaced grid 4 × 6 within the asymmetric cell with x = 0.50 and y = 0.65 Å as shown in Fig.…”
Section: He@tio 2 (110)-(1 × 1) Potential Energy Surfacementioning
confidence: 99%