1998
DOI: 10.1016/s0966-6362(98)00019-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Geometrical analysis of hip and knee joint mobility in cerebral palsied children

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Kuno et al (1998) developed a geometrical model in the saggital plane to analyse range of motion in normal and CP children. Photographic analysis was used to calculate joint angles.…”
Section: Background and Previous Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kuno et al (1998) developed a geometrical model in the saggital plane to analyse range of motion in normal and CP children. Photographic analysis was used to calculate joint angles.…”
Section: Background and Previous Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hip displacement is a further complication of cerebral palsy and is most prevalent in the group of children who do not walk (Hoffer 1986, Brunner et al 1997, Kuno et al 1998. Hip displacement is measured in the migration of the head of the femur away from the acetabulum and is divided into subluxation (typically >33% migration) and hip dislocation (typically >80% migration) (Scrutton et al 2001, Parrott et al 2002, Pountney et al 2002.…”
Section: Impairment Of Body Functions and Structuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…in 1964 [13] and were used to compare with those of pathological abnormal patients in 1967 [14]. Clinical gait analysis are used for rehabilitation program design [15], to evaluate the surgery outcomes [16], to study neurological disorders, such as cerebral palsy [17], to name a few.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Equation(3 -22) has different expression form from the original one in[42]. Equation(3)(4)(5)(6)(7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12)(13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18)(19)(20)(21)(22) is concise in expression…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%