Geometrical Approaches for the Accurate Identification of Normal Vertical Positions of Sella and Nasion Points in Cephalograms

Abstract

Objective. The aim of the study is to identify the normal vertical positions of sella (S) and nasion (N) points in subjects with a normal inclination of anterior cranial bases. Materials and Methods. Lateral cephalograms of 117 subjects who had a normal ∠SN-FH plane (7° ± 1°), ∠SN-palatal plane (9° ± 2°), ∠FH-palatal plane (1° ± 1°), and cranial base angles (131° ± 4°) were included in the study. Various linear and angular parameters and ratios were evaluated to determine the normal vertical positions of S and N points. An unpaired t-test was used to identify any significant differences between males and females. The P value of 0.05 was considered as the level of significance. Results. Among subjects with the normal inclinations of SN, FH, and palatal planes and cranial base angle, the mean values of ∠Ar-S-Ptm, ∠S-Ptm-Ar, and ∠S-Ar-Ptm were 59.38° ± 3.52°, 59.70° ± 3.21°, and 60.84° ± 3.56°, respectively, forming an almost equilateral triangle between S, Ar, and Ptm points. The mean values of ∠Ba-S-PNS, ∠S-PNS-Ba, and ∠S-Ba-PNS were 59.56° ± 3.17°, 59.72° ± 3.47°, and 60.76° ± 3.11°, respectively, forming another approximate equilateral triangle between S, Ba, and PNS points. The mean S-FH to N-FH ratio was 0.67 ± 0.06% for the whole sample, but it was significantly greater in males (0.69 ± 0.07%) compared to females (0.65 ± 0.06%) ( P = 0.002 ). Conclusions. Two approximate equilateral triangles were formed between S, Ar, and Ptm points; and S, Ba, and PNS points in subjects with normal inclinations of SN, FH, and palatal planes and cranial base angle. The S-FH to N-FH ratio was an excellent guide to locating the normal vertical position of S and N points.

The Association Between Skeletal Facial Types and Third Molars Impaction in a Saudi Arabian Subpopulation: A CBCT Study

“… 13 When assessing the sagittal maxillary and mandibular relationship, the ANB angle is one of the most widely accepted and used cephalometric parameters. 14 McNamara’s analysis is also widely recognized and offers certain advantages over other analyses, such as the linear evaluation of maxillary and mandibular lengths. 15 , 16 …”

“…13 When assessing the sagittal maxillary and mandibular relationship, the ANB angle is one of the most widely accepted and used cephalometric parameters. 14 McNamara's analysis is also widely recognized and offers certain advantages over other analyses, such as the linear evaluation of maxillary and mandibular lengths. 15,16 Both lateral cephalometric and cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) analyses are commonly used methods for craniofacial assessment in orthodontic and surgical patients.…”