1997
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-246x.1997.tb05315.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Geometrical models for poroelastic behaviour

Abstract: S U M M A R YPoroelasticity implicitly incorporates pore structure information through the use of empirically determined macroscopic parameters; hence, quantitative analysis of pore geometry effects on poroelastic behaviour cannot be performed. Analogues for poro-. elastic parameters with explicit dependence on pore structure are derived here by using an inclusion-based model where inclusions represent individual pores. The inclusionbased formulation used in this paper permits uniform pore fluid pressure throu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These models successfully predict that the macroscopic properties depend not only on the volume fraction of the liquid phase but also strongly depend on the shape of the inclusions, such as spheres [e.g., Mackenzie, 1950; Eshelby, 1957], oblate spheroids with variable aspect ratio [Wu, 1966;Walsh, 1965Walsh, , 1969Kuster and ToksSz, 1974; ToksSz e! al., 1976; $chraeling, 1985;Endres, 1997], and tube geometry with variable pore shape [Mavko, 1980]. These shapes, however, have been chosen for the sake of mathematical simplicity to calculate the mechanical effects of the inclusions.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These models successfully predict that the macroscopic properties depend not only on the volume fraction of the liquid phase but also strongly depend on the shape of the inclusions, such as spheres [e.g., Mackenzie, 1950; Eshelby, 1957], oblate spheroids with variable aspect ratio [Wu, 1966;Walsh, 1965Walsh, , 1969Kuster and ToksSz, 1974; ToksSz e! al., 1976; $chraeling, 1985;Endres, 1997], and tube geometry with variable pore shape [Mavko, 1980]. These shapes, however, have been chosen for the sake of mathematical simplicity to calculate the mechanical effects of the inclusions.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…structural clay in a reservoir of sandstone). The formulation is inspired by the works of Sheng (1990), Hudson et al (1996), Endres (1997), Xu (1998) and many others (see Jakobsen et al 2003b). The population of inclusions is divided into families of inclusions having the same shape/orientation, t‐matrices t ( n ) (discussed below), and volume concentration v ( n ) , labelled by n = 1, 2, … , N .…”
Section: Inclusion‐based Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In any case, one has to transform from the stiffness to the compliance domain if the goal is to demonstrate that an inclusion‐based model of rocks as viscoelastic composites is consistent with the relations of Brown & Korringa (1975) (or their isotropic version discovered by Gassmann (1951)) for low‐frequency dependence of the elastic properties of a porous rock on the compressibility of the pore fluid (e.g. Thomsen 1985; Endres 1997).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Dvorkin and Nur (1993) have developed a unified model with the local and global flow mechanisms, which is [not consistent with the theory of Gassmann (1951), as it should be (see Thomsen, 1985), according to Chapman et al (2002)] valid for porous media with a single solid constituent only and have another serious drawback in common with Biot's original model: microstructural information is simply incorporated through the use of empirically determined macroscopic parameters. In principle, it is possible to remove this drawback (see Burridge and Keller, 1981) and/or extend Biot's theory to complex porous media (see Berryman and Milton, 1991;Berryman, 1992Berryman, , 1998Berryman and Wang, 1998), but the works of many scientists (e.g., O'Connell and Budiansky, 1977;Budiansky and O'Connell, 1980;O'Connell, 1983;Hudson et al, 1996;Ravalec and Gueguen, 1996;Endres and Knight, 1997;Endres, 1997;Xu, 1998;Pointer et al, 2000;Tod, 2001Tod, , 2002 suggest that a good theory for rocks need not necessarily be based on Biot's approach at all.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%