1988
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-83017-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Geometrical Relationships of Macroscopic Nuclear Physics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
196
1
1

Year Published

1993
1993
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 296 publications
(202 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
4
196
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…We have suspected for a while the validity of the assumption that the emission of the fission fragments was isotropic in the center-of-mass, which, as said in section 2.11, was used to determine the transmission correction factor. We have made a carefull simulation of this effect with the INCL4/ABLA code, which provides the angular momentum at the end of the INC stage, deducing the corresponding anisotropies from [50,51]. Although the resulting anisotropy is non negligible in the system of the fissioning nucleus, the effect is completely washed out because the directions of the recoil velocity and of the angular momentum of the nucleus after the INC stage fluctuate very much.…”
Section: Total Fission Cross-sectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We have suspected for a while the validity of the assumption that the emission of the fission fragments was isotropic in the center-of-mass, which, as said in section 2.11, was used to determine the transmission correction factor. We have made a carefull simulation of this effect with the INCL4/ABLA code, which provides the angular momentum at the end of the INC stage, deducing the corresponding anisotropies from [50,51]. Although the resulting anisotropy is non negligible in the system of the fissioning nucleus, the effect is completely washed out because the directions of the recoil velocity and of the angular momentum of the nucleus after the INC stage fluctuate very much.…”
Section: Total Fission Cross-sectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the ground state, F 2 and F 3 are equal to 1, as we assume no deformation of the nucleus. To take into account the effects of deformation at the saddle point, we use again the parametrisation done by Hasse and Meyer [25],…”
Section: Level Density Parametermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1][2][3][4][5]. These phenomenological models, often augmented by a shell correction which is calculated using average single-particle potentials, have been tuned up to describe nuclear bulk properties to a high precision.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%