2006
DOI: 10.1080/00379271.2006.10697450
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Géométrie morphologique des ailes des Acrididae (Orthoptera : Caelifera) : sexe, stridulation, caractère

Abstract: Summary. Geometric morphometrics of Acrididae wings (Orthoptera, Caelifera): sex, stridulation and character. Tegmina nervation of west palaearctic Acrididae was studied with two independent methods of morphometrics, in order to address adaptive characters toward stridulation and phylogenetic information. Geometric morphometrics dealt with eight landmarks located in the proximal region of tegmina, including median field. The relative width of every field was submitted to a PCA. It appears that sexual dimorphis… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this sense, variables describing the morphological variation of the tegmina such as forewing length, median plate relative length or the first axis of forewing shape exhibited the highest between‐species variation for both sexes (λ > 0.75). Forewings are involved in several biological functions in Orthoptera such as sound production during courtship, flight and thermoregulation (Noguerales et al., ; Petit, Picaud, & Elghadraoui, ; Thomas et al., ); therefore, natural and sexual selection can be responsible of strong among‐species variation in this structure (Klingenberg, Debat, & Roff, ). Conversely, prozone length and pronotum shape showed on average low phylogenetic signal (0.30 < λ < 0.60), indicating the lower informativeness of these traits for delimiting taxa (Solís‐Lemus et al., ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this sense, variables describing the morphological variation of the tegmina such as forewing length, median plate relative length or the first axis of forewing shape exhibited the highest between‐species variation for both sexes (λ > 0.75). Forewings are involved in several biological functions in Orthoptera such as sound production during courtship, flight and thermoregulation (Noguerales et al., ; Petit, Picaud, & Elghadraoui, ; Thomas et al., ); therefore, natural and sexual selection can be responsible of strong among‐species variation in this structure (Klingenberg, Debat, & Roff, ). Conversely, prozone length and pronotum shape showed on average low phylogenetic signal (0.30 < λ < 0.60), indicating the lower informativeness of these traits for delimiting taxa (Solís‐Lemus et al., ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We indicate the main traits (veins and plates) used to define the position of the landmarks: Md , media vein; Cu , cubitus vein; Sc , subcosta vein; An1 and An2 , anal 1 and anal 2 veins, respectively. MP , median plate, delimited by media and cubitus veins (see Bethoux & Nel, ; Petit et al ., ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Body size strongly correlates with life‐history and fitness‐related traits, and thus, it constitutes a key character and target of selection (Blanckenhorn, ; Whitman, ; Kanuch et al ., ). Forewings are strongly sclerotized structures involved in sound production and courtship rituals in Orthoptera (Petit et al ., ; Routtu et al ., ; Klingenberg et al ., ). FWL is considered a good proxy of dispersal ability (Thomas et al ., ; Simmons & Thomas, ; Heidinger et al ., ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Furthermore, forewing veins and their intersections are homologous among bees with three submarginal cells, like bumble bees (Ross 1936, Michener 2007). The method is rather robust at diagnosing and discriminating taxa at different levels ( e.g ., Pretorius 2005, Petit et al 2006, Sadeghi et al 2009, Francoy et al 2012, Perrard et al 2014), and has been employed successfully in palaeontological studies for evaluating the taxonomic affinities of otherwise difficult to determine fossils ( e.g ., Kennedy et al 2009, Michez et al 2009, Dehon et al 2014, 2017, Dewulf et al 2014, Perrard et al 2016). Moreover, several studies have demonstrated the application of forewing shape analyses for discriminating subgenera, species, and populations of bumble bees ( e.g ., Aytekin et al 2007, Wappler et al 2012, Barkan and Aytekin 2013).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%