2013 26th International Conference on VLSI Design and 2013 12th International Conference on Embedded Systems 2013
DOI: 10.1109/vlsid.2013.197
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Geometry Independent Wirelength Estimation Method in VLSI Routing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The proposed hybrid algorithm is compared with some standard benchmark ISPD’98 (Alpert, 1998) for VLSI global routing, and the wire length obtained is measured against Sardar et al (2013) as arranged in Table 7. The results clearly exhibit the comparable efficiency of the proposed algorithm, which deviates around 7% from the benchmark, and in some cases, the proposed algorithm establishes its supremacy.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The proposed hybrid algorithm is compared with some standard benchmark ISPD’98 (Alpert, 1998) for VLSI global routing, and the wire length obtained is measured against Sardar et al (2013) as arranged in Table 7. The results clearly exhibit the comparable efficiency of the proposed algorithm, which deviates around 7% from the benchmark, and in some cases, the proposed algorithm establishes its supremacy.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…EIWO-PSO hybrid generates minimum wire length cost of 18,014 shown in Figure 12 as compared to 18,405 of EIWO-PSO hybrid for 500 terminal nodes. Figure 13 shows the MRST generated by EIWO algorithm on 1,000 terminal nodes The proposed hybrid algorithm is compared with some standard benchmark ISPD'98 (Alpert, 1998) for VLSI global routing, and the wire length obtained is measured against Sardar et al (2013) as arranged in Table 7. The results clearly exhibit the comparable efficiency of the proposed algorithm, which deviates around 7% from the benchmark, and in some cases, the proposed algorithm establishes its supremacy.…”
Section: Test On Big Instancesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation