1999
DOI: 10.4064/cm-79-1-85-118
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Geometry of modules over tame quasi-tilted algebras

Abstract: We prove that if a quasi-tilted algebra is tame, then the associated moduli spaces are products of projective spaces. Together with an earlier result of Chindris this gives a geometric characterization of the tame quasi-tilted algebras. In proof we use knowledge of the representation theory of the tame quasi-tilted algebras and a construction of semi-invariants as determinants.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
50
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
50
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results of [8] imply that both factors are normal, hence regular in codimension one, and the claim follows for this component.…”
Section: Proof Of the Main Resultsmentioning
confidence: 61%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The results of [8] imply that both factors are normal, hence regular in codimension one, and the claim follows for this component.…”
Section: Proof Of the Main Resultsmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…This strategy has been successfully applied in [5,8,9,11]. In particular, the main results of [8,9] imply that if d is the dimension vector of an indecomposable module over a tame quasi-tilted algebra Λ, then mod Λ (d) has at most two irreducible components.…”
Section: Introduction and The Main Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our first theorem generalizes to regular modules over arbitrary canonical algebra a result obtained for indecomposable modules over tame canonical algebra in [2]. …”
Section: Introduction and Main Resultsmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…Let h be the unique isotropic Schur root of A. The module variety mod(A, h) is irreducible by Corollary 3 in [2], and let us denote its cone of effective weights by Eff(A, h). We know from Lemma 3.2 that there exists a module M ∈ mod(A, h) which is θ h -stable.…”
Section: In What Follows We Denote By H(d) the Hyperplane In ‫ޒ‬mentioning
confidence: 99%